The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science
Open accessAbstract
Helping students develop informed views of nature of science (NOS) has been and continues to be a central goal for kindergarten through Grade 12 (K–12) science education. Since the early 1960s, major efforts have been undertaken to enhance K–12 students and science teachers' NOS views. However, the crucial component of assessing learners' NOS views remains an issue in research on NOS. This article aims to (a) trace the development of a new open‐ended instrument, the Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS), which in conjunction with individual interviews aims to provide meaningful assessments of learners' NOS views; (b) outline the NOS framework that underlies the development of the VNOS; (c) present evidence regarding the validity of the VNOS; (d) elucidate the use of the VNOS and associated interviews, and the range of NOS aspects that it aims to assess; and (e) discuss the usefulness of rich descriptive NOS profiles that the VNOS provides in research related to teaching and learning about NOS. The VNOS comes in response to some calls within the science education community to go back to developing standardized forced‐choice paper and pencil NOS assessment instruments designed for mass administrations to large samples. We believe that these calls ignore much of what was learned from research on teaching and learning about NOS over the past 30 years. The present state of this line of research necessitates a focus on individual classroom interventions aimed at enhancing learners' NOS views, rather than on mass assessments aimed at describing or evaluating students' beliefs. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 497–521, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
(2013) · A Realist Theory of Science · doi:10.4324/9780203090732-9 · Cited by 7,731
Educational Research: An Introduction
Bennett, N., Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1984) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121583 · Cited by 5,595
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
Hutchison, T. W., & Popper, K. R. (1964) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2551371 · Cited by 4,197
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
Hesse, M., & Popper, K. R. (1965) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218271 · Cited by 4,189
Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research
Lederman, N. G. (1992) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404 · Cited by 2,169
Self-citationRutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,841
Educational Research: An Introduction
Gall, G. A. (2003) · Cited by 1,664
Shapin, S. (2018) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226398488.001.0001 · Cited by 1,587
Lovejoy, C. O. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.211.4480.341 · Cited by 1,396
Cited by
Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report
Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., Pelaez, N., Rowland, S., et al. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-01-0004 · Cited by 1,043
Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science
van Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Savran Gencer, A., & BouJaoude, S. (2015) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6 · Cited by 852
Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice
Sadler, T. D. (2009) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260802681839 · Cited by 667
Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3‐year professional development program
Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20159 · Cited by 334
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21575 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 497-521
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2140176804
- Cited by
- 1,908
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 119.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.10034
- The paper
- Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.