The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the cultural validity of science assessments
Open accessAbstract
We propose the concept of cultural validity as a form of test validity in science assessment. The conceptual relevance of cultural validity is supported by evidence that culture and society shape an individual's mind and thinking. To attain cultural validity, the process of assessment development must consider how the sociocultural context in which students live influences the ways in which they make sense of science items and the ways in which they solve them. These sociocultural influences include the values, beliefs, experiences, communication patterns, teaching and learning styles, and epistemologies inherent in the students' cultural backgrounds, as well as the socioeconomic conditions prevailing in their cultural groups. We contend that current approaches to handling student diversity in assessment (e.g., adapting or translating tests, providing assessment accommodations, estimating test cultural bias) are limited and lack sociocultural perspective. We find that attaining cultural validity may conflict with current basic principles and assumptions in testing, such as item independence and standardization. We discuss the ways in which adopting cultural validity as a criterion for test validity makes it necessary to shift assessment paradigms and adopt new procedures for assessment development. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 38: 553–573, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
(1979) · The Mathematics Teacher · doi:10.5951/mt.72.8.0637 · Cited by 8,499
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
Steele, C. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 · Cited by 6,770
Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed)
Morse, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(96)00056-6 · Cited by 5,593
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · Cited by 5,248
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Venkatesan, M., Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1986) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151491 · Cited by 4,347
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality.
Oromaner, M., & Oakes, J. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070941 · Cited by 3,424
Cited by
Culturally Responsive Schooling for Indigenous Youth: A Review of the Literature
Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308323036 · Cited by 851
Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20080 · Cited by 150
Preparing for the Plunge: Preservice Teachers’ Assessment Literacy
Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6 · Cited by 127
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20141 · Cited by 108
Culturally Responsive Assessment: Provisional Principles
Walker, M. E., Olivera‐Aguilar, M., Lehman, B., Laitusis, C., Guzman‐Orth, D., & Gholson, M. (2023) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12374 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Solano‐Flores, G., & Nelson‐Barber, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04-30
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 553-573
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2049795368
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 26.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the cultural validity of science assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.1018
- The paper
- Solano‐Flores, G., & Nelson‐Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.