The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers' prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program
Abstract
Alternative certification programs (ACPs) have been proposed as a viable way to address teacher shortages, yet we know little about how teacher knowledge develops within such programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate prior knowledge for teaching among students entering an ACP, comparing individuals with teaching experience to those lacking teaching experience. Of the four participants seeking secondary biology teaching certification, two participants had 2 years of prior biology teaching experience. We used the Lesson Preparation Method as a data collection tool, asking participants to create lesson plans to teach the concept of heritable variation. Primary data sources were the lesson plans and follow‐up interview transcripts. Prior teaching experience made little difference as both groups held didactic teaching orientations and wrote similar lesson plans. Both groups drew on general pedagogical knowledge (PK), and had little pedagogical content knowledge for teaching heritable variation. Teaching experience did appear to lead to more integration among PK components. The study includes implications for the teacher education, research, and policy. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 46: 357–383, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem
Johnstone, A. H. (1991) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x · Cited by 1,321
Cited by
Relating Teacher PCK and Teacher Practice Using Classroom Observation
Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z · Cited by 125
The Development of Prospective Secondary Biology Teachers PCK
Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2013) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9312-1 · Cited by 95
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-383
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2145986837
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.