The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a hypothetical multi‐dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter
Abstract
We describe efforts toward the development of a hypothetical learning progression (HLP) for the growth of grade 7–14 students' models of the structure, behavior and properties of matter, as it relates to nanoscale science and engineering (NSE). This multi‐dimensional HLP, based on empirical research and standards documents, describes how students need to incorporate and connect ideas within and across their models of atomic structure, the electrical forces that govern interactions at the nano‐, molecular, and atomic scales, and information in the Periodic Table to explain a broad range of phenomena. We developed a progression from empirical data that characterizes how students currently develop their knowledge as part of the development and refinement of the HLP. We find that most students are currently at low levels in the progression, and do not perceive the connections across strands in the progression that are important for conceptual understanding. We suggest potential instructional strategies that may help students build organized and integrated knowledge structures to consolidate their understanding, ready them for new ideas in science, and help them construct understanding of emerging disciplines such as NSE, as well as traditional science disciplines. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 47:687–715, 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,101
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · Cited by 5,248
Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,195
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages
McNemar, Q. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295996 · Cited by 4,754
Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View
Gagné, R. M., Ausubel, D. P., & Gagne, R. M. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161899 · Cited by 3,278
Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3327 · Cited by 2,480
Piaget, J. (1976) · Piaget and His School · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2 · Cited by 2,167
Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2 · Cited by 1,923
Cited by
Adadan, E. (2013) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9299-9 · Cited by 62
Fonger, N. L., Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Isler, I., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M. (2018) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1392965 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-16
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 687-715
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2149148166
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 59.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing a hypothetical multi‐dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.20324
- The paper
- Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi‐dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.