Cited by 46Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesScience Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Developing a learning progression for curriculum, instruction, and student learning: An example from mathematics education

Open access
Fonger, Nicole L., Stephens, Ana, Blanton, Maria, Isler, Isil, Knuth, Eric, Gardiner, Angela Murphy·2018·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

Learning progressions have been demarcated by some for science education, or only concerned with levels of sophistication in student thinking as determined by logical analyses of the discipline. We take the stance that learning progressions can be leveraged in mathematics education as a form of curriculum research that advances a linked understanding of students learning over time through careful articulation of a curricular framework and progression, instructional sequence, assessments, and levels of sophistication in student learning. Under this broadened conceptualization, we advance a methodology for developing and validating learning progressions, and advance several design considerations that can guide research concerned with engendering forms of mathematics learning, and curricular and instructional support for that learning. We advance a two-phase methodology of (a) research and development, and (b) testing and revision. Each phase involves iterative cycles of design and experimentation with the aim of developing a validated learning progression. In particular, we gathered empirical data to revise our hypothesized curricular framework and progression and to measure change in students. thinking over time as a means to validate both the effectiveness of our instructional sequence and of the assessments designed to capture learning. We use the context of early algebra to exemplify our approach to learning progressions in mathematics education with a focus on the concept of mathematical equivalence across Grades 3-5. The domain of work on research on learning over time is evolving; our work contributes a broadened role for learning progressions work in mathematics education research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07370008.2017.1392965

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The context of numerical equalities based on arithmetic properties has been highlighted for its potential to promote relational thinking.

    “The context of numerical equalities based on arithmetic properties has been highlighted for its potential to promote this type of thinking [7,15,19].”

    From Third Grade Students’ Use of Relational Thinking (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Teaching has a positive effect on relational thinking when it is linked to promoting the understanding of the equal sign as a representation of equivalence.

    “Teaching has a positive effect on relational thinking when it is linked to promoting the understanding of the equal sign as a representation of equivalence [7,23].”

    From Third Grade Students’ Use of Relational Thinking (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fonger, N. L., Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Isler, I., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Tahoe Environmental Research Center (US)
  • Middle East Technical University
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Fonger, Nicole L.
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
2017-12-18
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
30-55
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2779085024
Cited by
46
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Directorate for Education and Human Resources (DRL-1207945, DRL-1219605/1219606)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305B130007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
learning progression, mathematics education, early algebra, mathematical equivalence, curriculum framework, instructional sequence, assessment design, curriculum development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review