The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature
Abstract
Science education models for secondary and college students as well as K‐12 teachers have been dominated by classroom‐based approaches. Recently, research apprenticeships wherein learners worked with practicing scientists on authentic scientific research have become increasingly popular. The purpose of this critical review of the literature was to review and synthesize empirical studies that have explored learning outcomes associated with research apprenticeships for science learners. We reviewed 53 studies of scientific research apprenticeship experiences for secondary students, undergraduates and teachers, both pre‐service and in‐service. The review explored various learning outcomes associated with participation in research apprenticeships. These outcomes included effects of apprenticeship experiences on participant career aspirations, ideas about the nature of science (NOS), understandings of scientific content, confidence for doing science and intellectual development. The extant literature supported many of the presumed positive associations between apprenticeship experiences and desired learning outcomes, but findings related to some themes (e.g., NOS understandings) supported conflicting conclusions. Implications included importance of the length of the apprenticeship, need to explicitly place attention on desired outcomes, and engagement of participants. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 47:235–256, 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20173 · Cited by 1,324
Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Studen Retention
Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0016 · Cited by 724
Kardash, C. M. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191 · Cited by 563
Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0011 · Cited by 535
Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A. (2001) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1003_3 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x · Cited by 757
Rodenbusch, S. E., Hernandez, P. R., Simmons, S. L., & Dolan, E. L. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0117 · Cited by 430
Longitudinal associations among undergraduates' research experience, self-efficacy, and identity
Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21221 · Cited by 272
Adedokun, O. A., Bessenbacher, A. B., Parker, L. C., Kirkham, L. L., & Burgess, W. D. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21102 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-18
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-256
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2011119787
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 42.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.