Cited by 535Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education and EmployabilityHigher Education Practises and Engagement

Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience

Bauer, Karen W., Bennett, Joan S.·2003·The Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

On a survey of 986 alumni from a research-extensive university, respondents with undergraduate research experience, when compared to those with no research experience, reported greater enhancement of important cognitive and personal skills as well as higher satisfaction with their undergraduate education. They were also more likely to pursue graduate degrees.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jhe.2003.0011

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S.
Venue
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2003
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
210-230
ISSN
  • 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4640
OpenAlex
W2037326504
Cited by
535
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
21.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
undergraduate research experience, alumni perceptions, cognitive skills, personal skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review