The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains
Abstract
This research examines science‐simulation software available for grades 6–12 science courses. The study presented, funded by the National Science Foundation, had two objectives: a literature synthesis and a product review. The literature synthesis examines research findings on grade 6–12 student learning gains and losses using virtual laboratories and science‐simulation software, derived from a review of 79 relevant studies identified. Based on that literature, significant aspects of how such products influence student learning are identified. Tables summarize the research‐based evidence about best practices in instructional design for such virtual lab and simulation products. Some products were then reviewed as case studies to determine in what ways and to what extent they implement such research‐identified best practices. The overall goal was to consider where the most progress is being made in effective virtual‐lab and simulation products, and what directions future development should take. The intent is to inform science educators, teachers, administrators, and policy makers who are using, buying, and examining middle and high school instructional materials. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 1050–1078, 2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002179 · Cited by 1,593
Inquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20039 · Cited by 385
Information presentation and troubleshooting in electrical circuits
Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/69032000072809 · Cited by 44
Cited by
The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy
Moro, C., Štromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1696 · Cited by 1,040
Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis
Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010 · Cited by 574
(2013) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 215
Olympiou, G., Zacharias, Z., & deJong, T. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9245-2 · Cited by 132
Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning
Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.748664 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1050-1078
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2037520324
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 59.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.