The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform
Abstract
Science education standards established by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the National Research Council (NRC) urge less emphasis on memorizing scientific facts and more emphasis on students investigating the everyday world and developing deep understanding from their inquiries. These approaches to instruction challenge teachers and students, particularly urban students who often have additional challenges related to poverty. We report data on student learning spanning 3 years from a science education reform collaboration with the Detroit Public Schools. Data were collected from nearly 8,000 students who participated in inquiry‐based and technology‐infused curriculum units that were collaboratively developed by district personnel and staff from the University of Michigan as part of a larger, district‐wide systemic reform effort in science education. The results show statistically significant increases on curriculum‐based test scores for each year of participation. Moreover, the strength of the effects grew over the years, as evidenced by increasing effect size estimates across the years. The findings indicate that students who historically are low achievers in science can succeed in standards‐based, inquiry science when curriculum is carefully developed and aligned with professional development and district policies. Additional longitudinal research on the development of student understanding over multiple inquiry projects, the progress of teacher enactment over time, and the effect of changes in the policy and administrative environment would further contribute to the intellectual and practical tools necessary to implement meaningful standards‐based systemic reform in science. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 41: 1063–1080, 2004
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LeTUS teacher pool was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience.
“Our teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned but was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience, with a slightly higher percentage teaching outside of their certification area than the district norm (Marx et al., 2004).”
From Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform (2008) · cites this paper as Marx et al., 2004
The first year of 7th grade enactment showed the weakest pre- to post-test gains in the curriculum-specific tests (Marx et al., 2004).
“This is consistent with the results of our curriculum-specific tests, where the first year of 7th grade enactment showed the weakest pre- to post-test gains (Marx et al., 2004).”
From Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform (2008) · cites this paper as Marx et al., 2004
The LeTUS teacher pool had a slightly higher percentage teaching outside their certification area than the district norm.
“Our teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned but was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience, with a slightly higher percentage teaching outside of their certification area than the district norm (Marx et al., 2004).”
From Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform (2008) · cites this paper as Marx et al., 2004
The LeTUS teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned.
“Our teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned but was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience, with a slightly higher percentage teaching outside of their certification area than the district norm (Marx et al., 2004).”
From Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform (2008) · cites this paper as Marx et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849209543534 · Cited by 7,339
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594 · cited 1×
“Inquiry learning requires them to collaborate with peers, think deeply about complex concepts, relate new science content to their lives inside and outside school, and self-regulate their behavior and thinking across the weeks that an inquiry project might unfold ( Blumenfeld, Soloway, Marx, Krajcik, Guzdial, & Palinc…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDesign Experiments in Educational Research
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009 · Cited by 3,548
“Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project‐based science
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1014 · Cited by 381
Self-citationAddressing the challenges of inquiry‐based learning through technology and curriculum design
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3 · Cited by 366
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy, Project 2061
- Anderson L.W., 2001, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives
- Berends M., 2001, Implementation and performance in New American Schools
- 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2 · DOI
- 10.1086/461782 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.1037 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X024009011 · DOI
- Cohen D.K., 1999, Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report Series No. RR‐043)
- Cronbach L.J., 1971, Educational measurement
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3 · DOI
- Fuhrman S.H., 2001, From the capitol to the classroom: Standards‐based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II)
- 10.3102/00028312038004915 · DOI · Paper page
- Hannaway J., 2001, From the capitol to the classroom: Standards‐based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II), 99
- Hug B., 2002, International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 167
- Jackson S., 2000, Advanced designs for the technologies of learning: Innovations in science and mathematics education, 77
- 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<1019::AID-TEA9>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
- Klein S., 2000, Teaching practices and student achievement: Report of the first year findings of the “Mosaic” study of systemic initiatives in mathematics and science
- Krajcik J.S., 1998, First attempts at inquiry strategies in middle school, project‐based science classrooms, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313, 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057 · DOI
- Krajcik J.S., 2000, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 283
- Lee O., 2002, Review of Research in Education, 23
- 10.1002/sce.10086 · DOI
- 10.1086/461870 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00059-6 · DOI
- Moje E., 2004, Bridging the gap: Improving literacy for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4–12, 227
- National Research Council, 1996, The national science education standards
- Porter A.C., 2001, From the capitol to the classroom: Standards‐based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II), 60
- 10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.10027 · DOI · Paper page
- Rutherford F.J., 1990, Science for all Americans
- 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3 · DOI
- Smith M.S., 1991, The politics of curriculum and testing, 233
- 10.1145/174809.174813 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.10085 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904800014003001 · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.1017 · DOI
- Wilson S.M., 1999, Review of research in education, 173
- 10.1002/tea.1033 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay‐Chambers, J. (2008) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20248 · Cited by 423
Self-citationStrengthening the research base that informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis
Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2019) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373719849044 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Marx, Ronald W.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1063-1080
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2066748738
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 51.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Keywords
- inquiry-based science teaching, urban students, systemic reform, science education standards, low-achieving students, Detroit Public Schools, professional development, curriculum alignment, effect size, longitudinal assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review