Cited by 385Science Education and PedagogyScience and Education ResearchEvolution and Science Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform

Marx, Ronald W., Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., Krajcik, Joseph S., Fishman, Barry, Soloway, Elliot, Geier, Robert, Tal, Revital Tali·2004·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

Science education standards established by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the National Research Council (NRC) urge less emphasis on memorizing scientific facts and more emphasis on students investigating the everyday world and developing deep understanding from their inquiries. These approaches to instruction challenge teachers and students, particularly urban students who often have additional challenges related to poverty. We report data on student learning spanning 3 years from a science education reform collaboration with the Detroit Public Schools. Data were collected from nearly 8,000 students who participated in inquiry‐based and technology‐infused curriculum units that were collaboratively developed by district personnel and staff from the University of Michigan as part of a larger, district‐wide systemic reform effort in science education. The results show statistically significant increases on curriculum‐based test scores for each year of participation. Moreover, the strength of the effects grew over the years, as evidenced by increasing effect size estimates across the years. The findings indicate that students who historically are low achievers in science can succeed in standards‐based, inquiry science when curriculum is carefully developed and aligned with professional development and district policies. Additional longitudinal research on the development of student understanding over multiple inquiry projects, the progress of teacher enactment over time, and the effect of changes in the policy and administrative environment would further contribute to the intellectual and practical tools necessary to implement meaningful standards‐based systemic reform in science. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 41: 1063–1080, 2004

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.20039

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LeTUS teacher pool was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience.

    “Our teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned but was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience, with a slightly higher percentage teaching outside of their certification area than the district norm (Marx et al., 2004).”
  • The first year of 7th grade enactment showed the weakest pre- to post-test gains in the curriculum-specific tests (Marx et al., 2004).

    “This is consistent with the results of our curriculum-specific tests, where the first year of 7th grade enactment showed the weakest pre- to post-test gains (Marx et al., 2004).”
  • The LeTUS teacher pool had a slightly higher percentage teaching outside their certification area than the district norm.

    “Our teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned but was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience, with a slightly higher percentage teaching outside of their certification area than the district norm (Marx et al., 2004).”
  • The LeTUS teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned.

    “Our teacher pool was comparable to the general Detroit teacher population in highest degree earned but was lower than the DPS average in years of teaching experience, with a slightly higher percentage teaching outside of their certification area than the district norm (Marx et al., 2004).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy, Project 2061
  2. Anderson L.W., 2001, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives
  3. Berends M., 2001, Implementation and performance in New American Schools
  4. 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/461782 · DOI
  6. 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/tea.1037 · DOI
  8. 10.3102/0013189X024009011 · DOI
  9. Cohen D.K., 1999, Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report Series No. RR‐043)
  10. Cronbach L.J., 1971, Educational measurement
  11. 10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3 · DOI
  13. Fuhrman S.H., 2001, From the capitol to the classroom: Standards‐based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II)
  14. 10.3102/00028312038004915 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hannaway J., 2001, From the capitol to the classroom: Standards‐based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II), 99
  16. Hug B., 2002, International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 167
  17. Jackson S., 2000, Advanced designs for the technologies of learning: Innovations in science and mathematics education, 77
  18. 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<1019::AID-TEA9>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  19. Klein S., 2000, Teaching practices and student achievement: Report of the first year findings of the “Mosaic” study of systemic initiatives in mathematics and science
  20. Krajcik J.S., 1998, First attempts at inquiry strategies in middle school, project‐based science classrooms, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313, 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057 · DOI
  21. Krajcik J.S., 2000, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 283
  22. Lee O., 2002, Review of Research in Education, 23
  23. 10.1002/sce.10086 · DOI
  24. 10.1086/461870 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00059-6 · DOI
  26. Moje E., 2004, Bridging the gap: Improving literacy for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4–12, 227
  27. National Research Council, 1996, The national science education standards
  28. Porter A.C., 2001, From the capitol to the classroom: Standards‐based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II), 60
  29. 10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/tea.10027 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Rutherford F.J., 1990, Science for all Americans
  32. 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3 · DOI
  33. Smith M.S., 1991, The politics of curriculum and testing, 233
  34. 10.1145/174809.174813 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/sce.10085 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/0895904800014003001 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/tea.1017 · DOI
  39. Wilson S.M., 1999, Review of research in education, 173
  40. 10.1002/tea.1033 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Marx, Ronald W.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1063-1080
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W2066748738
Cited by
385
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
FWCI
51.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
inquiry-based science teaching, urban students, systemic reform, science education standards, low-achieving students, Detroit Public Schools, professional development, curriculum alignment, effect size, longitudinal assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review