Cited by 733Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityScience Education and Pedagogy

Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors

Glynn, Shawn M., Brickman, Peggy, Armstrong, Norris, Taasoobshirazi, Gita·2011·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

From the perspective of social cognitive theory, the motivation of students to learn science in college courses was examined. The students—367 science majors and 313 nonscience majors—responded to the Science Motivation Questionnaire II, which assessed five motivation components: intrinsic motivation, self‐determination, self‐efficacy, career motivation, and grade motivation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence of questionnaire construct validity. The motivation components, especially self‐efficacy, were related to the students' college science grade point averages. The science majors scored higher than the nonscience majors on all of the motivation components. Among both science majors and nonscience majors, men had higher self‐efficacy than women, and women had higher self‐determination than men. The findings suggest that the questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool for assessing components of students' motivation to learn science in college courses, and that the components play a role in students' science achievement. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 1159–1176, 2011

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.20442

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-determination is an essential factor in human motivation that correlates with the other motivational factors measured in this study, especially intrinsic motivation.

    “Self-determination is an essential factor in human motivation that correlates with the other motivational factors measured in this study [47], especially the sense of intrinsic motivation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Glynn, Shawn M.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1159-1176
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W2136094206
Cited by
733
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
Science Motivation Questionnaire II, science motivation, intrinsic motivation, self-determination, self-efficacy, career motivation, grade motivation, college science courses, science majors, non-science majors, gender differences, social cognitive theory, construct validity, science achievement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review