Cited by 808Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversitySchool Choice and Performance

Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs

Simpkins, Sandra D., Davis-Kean, Pamela E., Eccles, Jacquelynne S.·2006·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This study addresses the longitudinal associations between youths' out-of-school activities, expectancies-values, and high school course enrollment in the domains of math and science. Data were collected on 227 youth who reported on their activity participation in 5th grade, expectancies-values in 6th and 10th grade, and courses taken throughout high school. Math and science course grades at 5th and 10th grade were gathered through school record data. Results indicated youths' math and science activity participation predicted their expectancies and values, which, in turn, predicted the number of high school courses above the predictive power of grades. Although there were mean-level differences between boys and girls on some of these indicators, relations among indicators did not significantly differ by gender.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Starting in elementary school, boys have higher levels of interest in math than girls, and the difference holds even when controlling for prior math achievement.

    “Starting in elementary school, gender differences also appear in boys ' and girls ' interests in different academic subjects; for example, elementary school-aged boys have higher levels of interest in math than do girls -and the difference holds even when controlling for prior math achievement (Simpkins et al., 2006).”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Simpkins et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2006
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
70-83
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2166538722
Cited by
808
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 36
FWCI
21.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 17553, R01HD017553)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
math motivation, science motivation, extracurricular activities, expectancy, values, course registration, longitudinal development, gender differences, adolescents
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Choice Behavior, Culture, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Motivation, Science, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review