The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students
Abstract
Recent research and policy documents call for engaging students and teachers in scientific practices such that the goal of science education shifts from students knowing scientific and epistemic ideas, to students developing and using these understandings as tools to make sense of the world. This perspective pushes students to move beyond the rote performance of scientific actions or processes and engage instead in purposeful knowledge construction work. This raises parallel questions about how to go beyond characterizing student performance of scientific process to understand their engagement in scientific practices as a goal‐directed activity. To that end, this article offers a framework—the Epistemologies in Practice (EIP) framework—for characterizing how students can engage meaningfully in scientific practices. This framework emphasizes two aspects of student engagement in scientific practices: (1) the students' epistemic goals for their knowledge construction work and (2) their epistemic understandings of how to engage in that work. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 53:1082–1112, 2016
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom
Mehan, H. (1979) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 · Cited by 2,872
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1204_2 · Cited by 1,061
Designing for Productive Failure
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.591717 · Cited by 674
‘Every good‐bye ain’t gone’: analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk
Lee, C. D. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518390600696729 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21409 · Cited by 173
Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Barzilai, S. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21468 · Cited by 165
Erduran, S., & Levrini, O. (2024) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2024.2306604 · Cited by 92
Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers
Dini, V., Sevian, H., Caushi, K., & Orduña Picón, R. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21559 · Cited by 61
Guiding collaborative revision of science explanations
Gerard, L., Kidron, A., & Linn, M. C. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09298-y · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1082-1112
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W1916972332
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 114.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.