Cited by 58Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and Pedagogy

Guiding collaborative revision of science explanations

Gerard, Libby, Kidron, Ady, Linn, Marcia C.·2019·International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11412-019-09298-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerard, L., Kidron, A., & Linn, M. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Gerard, Libby
Venue
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
291-324
ISSN
  • 1556-1607 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1615
OpenAlex
W2943445133
Cited by
58
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DRL-1119670, DRL-1418423, and DRL-01451604)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
collaborative revision, teacher guidance, computer-supported collaborative learning, automated grading, adaptive guidance, plate tectonics, teacher-student relationship, teacher professional development, virtual learning environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review