Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first‐generation college students in STEM and non‐STEM majors
Abstract
Representation of diverse groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is a persistent concern in the United States. Although there have been some strides toward more diverse representation, significant problems of underrepresentation remain in particular STEM fields: physical sciences, engineering, math, and computer sciences (PEMC). The purpose of this study is to understand the significance of pre‐college personal and academic factors along with early college experiences to explain persistence among first‐generation college students (FGCS) considering possible differences among PEMC‐STEM majors, other‐STEM majors, and non‐STEM majors. Using institutional and survey data from one 4‐year urban research institution in the Southeast, logistic regression models demonstrate the importance of early academic performance (first‐semester GPA) to increase odds of FGCS persistence across majors; and also reveal important differences. Besides early academic performance, the only other significant factor for persistence of PEMC‐STEM majors was perceived preparation in math. Perceived social fit was significant for persistence for the other‐STEM and non‐STEM majors, whereas perceived academic fit was only significant for non‐STEM majors. These results align generally with previous research, and also suggest that examining differences among STEM subgroups may help develop more nuanced understandings of the needs of different groups. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 53: 368–383, 2016
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
First-year GPA predicted STEM retention after three semesters in an analysis of approximately 1200 STEM first-generation college students.
“in an analysis of ∼1200 STEM first-generation college students, Dika and D’Amico (2016) found that first-year GPA predicted STEM retention after three semesters.”
From A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021) · cites this paper as Dika and D’Amico (2016)
Cites
Longitudinal associations among undergraduates' research experience, self-efficacy, and identity
Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21221 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1916903117 · Cited by 1,387 · see citing works
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Hempel, B., Kiehlbaugh, K., & Blowers, P. (2020) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.07.004 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
LaDue, N. D., Zocher, E., & Dugas, D. (2024) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-024-00116-1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dika, S. L., & D'Amico, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Department of Educational Leadership University of North Carolina at Charlotte 9201 University City Blvd. Charlotte North Carolina 28223
- Corresponding author
- Dika, Sandra L.
- ORCID
- Dika, Sandra L.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-22
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 368-383
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2205548068
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 35.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- first-generation college students, student persistence, STEM majors, non-STEM students, underrepresentation in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review