Cited by 429Science Education and PedagogyVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching Methods

Wait‐time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control: Part one‐wait‐time

Row, Mary Budd·1974·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.3660110202

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shown that many teachers leave less than one second after asking a question before asking another or answering their own question.

    “Research has shown that many leave less than one second after asking a question before, if no answer is forthcoming, asking another question, or answering their own question ( Rowe, 1974 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Row, M. B.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
81-94
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W2109836887
Cited by
429
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
52.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
waiting time, reward, instructional variables, language control, logic control, fate control, classroom management, student behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review