Cited by 397Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial

Alexander, Robin·2018·Research Papers in Education

Abstract

This paper considers the development and randomised control trial (RCT) of a dialogic teaching intervention designed to maximise the power of classroom talk to enhance students’ engagement and learning. Building on the author’s earlier work, the intervention’s pedagogical strand instantiates dialogic teaching not as a single, circumscribed ‘method’ but as an interlocking set of permissive repertoires through which, steered by principles of procedure, teachers energise their own and their students’ talk. The repertoires are directed both to teaching’s improvement and to its larger epistemological, cultural and civic purposes. Its professional strand entailed teacher induction and training followed by a cyclic programme of planning, target-setting and review using mentoring and video/audio analysis. Supported by the UK Education Endowment Foundation it was piloted in London and trialled in three other UK cities with combined intervention/control cohorts of nearly 5000 year 5 (4th grade) students and 208 teachers. The independent evaluation calculated that after 20 weeks students in the intervention group were two months ahead of their control group peers in English, mathematics and science tests; while coded video data showed that the changes in both teacher and student talk were striking and in the direction intended. The RCT methodology affords limited explanatory purchase but insights are available from other studies. These, together with contingent questions and future possibilities, are discussed in the paper’s conclusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Alexander R. J., 1984, Primary Teaching
  2. Alexander R. J., 2003, Talk for Learning: The First Year
  3. Alexander R. J., 2005, Talk for Learning: The Second Year
  4. Alexander R. J., 2005, Teaching through Dialogue: The First Year
  5. Alexander R. J., 2006, Education as Dialogue: Moral and Pedagogical Choices for a Runaway World
  6. Alexander R. J., 2017, Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk
  7. Alexander R. J., 2017, The CPRT/IEE Dialogic Teaching Project, Trial Stage, 2015–16: Handbook for Schools
  8. Alexander R. J., 2017, The CPRT/IEE Dialogic Teaching Project, Trial Stage, 2015–16: Planning and Review Forms for Mentors
  9. Alexander R. J., 1991, Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice in Primary Schools
  10. Black P., 1998, Inside the Black Box
  11. Britton J., 1969, Language, the Learner and the School, 81
  12. Dawes L., 2004, Thinking Together: A Programme of Activities for Developing Speaking and Listening
  13. Deakin Crick R., 2005, A Systematic Review of the Impact of Citizenship Education on Student Learning and Achievement
  14. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), 1998, The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for Teaching
  15. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), 1999, The National Numeracy Strategy: Framework for Teaching Mathematics from Reception to Year 6
  16. Flanders N. A., 1960, Interaction Analysis in the Classroom: A Manual for Observers
  17. Galton M., 2008, Creative Practitioners in Schools and Classrooms
  18. Ginsburg A., 2016, Do Randomized Control Trials Meet the ‘Gold Standard’?
  19. Higgins S., 2012, The Teaching and Learning Toolkit: Technical Appendices
  20. 10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1 · DOI
  21. 10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1 · DOI
  22. Mercer N., 2008, Exploring Talk in School
  23. Michaels S., 2012, Talk Science Primer
  24. 10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1 · DOI
  25. Nevill C., 2016, Do EEF Trials Meet the New “Gold Standard”?
  26. Norman K., 1992, Thinking Voices: The Work of the National Oracy Project
  27. Nystrand M., 1997, Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom
  28. Pollard A., 1985, The Social World of the Primary School
  29. 10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1 · DOI
  30. 10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1 · DOI
  31. Resnick L., 2010, From Genes to Context: New Discoveries about Learning from Educational Research and Their Applications, 163
  32. Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in Society
  33. Wragg E. C., 2001, Questioning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, R.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Robin
Venue
Research Papers in Education
Published
2018-06-17
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
561-598
ISSN
  • 0267-1522 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1146
OpenAlex
W2809201790
Cited by
397
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 17 · 2013: 2
FWCI
85.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research Papers in Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Education Endowment Foundation (UK) (2014)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
dialogic teaching, classroom discourse, student engagement, teacher induction, teacher professional development, mentoring, video analysis of teaching, intervention development, primary education, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review