The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies
Abstract
The influence of teacher beliefs on curriculum implementation was explored in two different contexts. Two middle‐level teachers implemented a 20‐lesson curriculum package in the presence of participant observers. Data sources included field notes and interview transcripts. The data were reviewed daily and tentative assertions were developed. Assertions and their accompanying evidence were examined weekly for recurring patterns. Case studies of the belief structures of each teacher were then prepared. In both cases, four major categories of beliefs appeared to influence curriculum implementation. These included beliefs about how students learn, a teacher's role in the classroom, the ability levels of students in a particular age group, and the relative importance of content topics. Both teachers believed that the most important student outcome is factual knowledge, that middle‐grade students learn through repeated drill and practice, and that middle school students require a great deal of direction. The teachers' beliefs differed in other areas, including beliefs about a teacher's role in the classroom and beliefs regarding the curriculum and its content topics. Although certain components of both teachers' belief structures enhanced the success of curriculum implementation, overall their existing belief structures were incongruent with the underlying philosophy of the intended curriculum, thus hampering successful implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Barnes D., 1982, Practical Curriculum Study
- Bogdan R. C., 1982, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods
- Brophy J. E., 1974, Teacher‐Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences
- Buchmann M., 1983, The school day and content commitments, The Elementary School Journal, 83, 244
- Clark C. M., 1981, Transforming Curriculum in Mathematics, Science, and Writing: A Case Study of Yearly Planning
- 10.1080/0022027800120202 · doi:10.1080/0022027800120202
- Cronin L. L.(1986).Intended versus implemented curricula: An interpretive study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Georgia Athens.
- Davis E., 1981, Teachers as Curriculum Evaluators
- 10.1007/BF01189290 · DOI · Paper page
- Fullan M., 1982, The Meaning of Educational Change
- Gage N. L., 1979, Research on Teaching: Concepts, Findings, and Implications
- James R. K.(1981). Understanding why curriculum innovations succeed or fail.Curriculum Innovations 487–495. · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1981.tb10011.x
- Kelly G. A., 1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs
- Lortie D. C., 1975, Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study
- 10.1007/BF00139803 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.3730690404 · doi:10.1002/sce.3730690404
- 1983, Project WILD—Elementary Activity Guide
- 10.1002/sce.3730660209 · DOI
- Rosenshine B., 1971, Teacher Behaviors and Student Achievement
- 1985, Scott‐Foresman Biology Courseware Series
- Siegel M. A., 1977, The Handbook of Curriculum
- 10.1002/tea.3660210703 · DOI
- von Glasersfeld E., 1983, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of PME‐NA
- 1985, Wildlife Inquiry Through Zoo Education
Cited by
Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (2006) · Science & Technology Education Library · doi:10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4 · Cited by 1,644
Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1023 · Cited by 555
Tam, A. C. F. (2015) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2014.928122 · Cited by 252
PIMENTEL, D. S., & McNEILL, K. L. (2013) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21061 · Cited by 162
Min, M., Whitehead, A., Wells, C., & Akerson, V. (2023) · International Journal of Research in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijres.3068 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronin‐Jones, L. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-250
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W1988885974
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660280305
- The paper
- Cronin‐Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.