Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies

Cronin‐Jones, Linda L.·1991·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

The influence of teacher beliefs on curriculum implementation was explored in two different contexts. Two middle‐level teachers implemented a 20‐lesson curriculum package in the presence of participant observers. Data sources included field notes and interview transcripts. The data were reviewed daily and tentative assertions were developed. Assertions and their accompanying evidence were examined weekly for recurring patterns. Case studies of the belief structures of each teacher were then prepared. In both cases, four major categories of beliefs appeared to influence curriculum implementation. These included beliefs about how students learn, a teacher's role in the classroom, the ability levels of students in a particular age group, and the relative importance of content topics. Both teachers believed that the most important student outcome is factual knowledge, that middle‐grade students learn through repeated drill and practice, and that middle school students require a great deal of direction. The teachers' beliefs differed in other areas, including beliefs about a teacher's role in the classroom and beliefs regarding the curriculum and its content topics. Although certain components of both teachers' belief structures enhanced the success of curriculum implementation, overall their existing belief structures were incongruent with the underlying philosophy of the intended curriculum, thus hampering successful implementation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.3660280305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Barnes D., 1982, Practical Curriculum Study
  2. Bogdan R. C., 1982, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods
  3. Brophy J. E., 1974, Teacher‐Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences
  4. Buchmann M., 1983, The school day and content commitments, The Elementary School Journal, 83, 244
  5. Clark C. M., 1981, Transforming Curriculum in Mathematics, Science, and Writing: A Case Study of Yearly Planning
  6. 10.1080/0022027800120202 · doi:10.1080/0022027800120202
  7. Cronin L. L.(1986).Intended versus implemented curricula: An interpretive study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Georgia Athens.
  8. Davis E., 1981, Teachers as Curriculum Evaluators
  9. 10.1007/BF01189290 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fullan M., 1982, The Meaning of Educational Change
  11. Gage N. L., 1979, Research on Teaching: Concepts, Findings, and Implications
  12. James R. K.(1981). Understanding why curriculum innovations succeed or fail.Curriculum Innovations 487–495. · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1981.tb10011.x
  13. Kelly G. A., 1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs
  14. Lortie D. C., 1975, Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study
  15. 10.1007/BF00139803 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/sce.3730690404 · doi:10.1002/sce.3730690404
  17. 1983, Project WILD—Elementary Activity Guide
  18. 10.1002/sce.3730660209 · DOI
  19. Rosenshine B., 1971, Teacher Behaviors and Student Achievement
  20. 1985, Scott‐Foresman Biology Courseware Series
  21. Siegel M. A., 1977, The Handbook of Curriculum
  22. 10.1002/tea.3660210703 · DOI
  23. von Glasersfeld E., 1983, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of PME‐NA
  24. 1985, Wildlife Inquiry Through Zoo Education

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Cronin‐Jones, L. L.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
235-250
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W1988885974
Cited by
362
References
1
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660280305
The paper
Cronin‐Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.