The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects
Abstract
This study examines individual and classroom‐level differences in motivation and strategy usage in sixth‐ and seventh‐grade middle school science. Results suggest that students who experience academic difficulties differ from both high achieving and special education students on measures of self‐efficacy, goal orientation, expectancy, value, and self‐concept of ability in science, with students who experience academic difficulties occasionally demonstrating less adaptive patterns of motivation and cognition than special education students in science. We used hierarchical linear modeling to examine between‐classroom differences in learning‐focused goal orientation. Findings indicate that students who have science teachers that use ability‐focused instructional practices (e.g., pointing out the best students as an example to others) are less learning focused, and exhibit a diminished relation between self‐concept of ability and being learning focused in science. Implications for science education reform are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.328 · Cited by 4,161
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594
Pursuing Scientific Literacy in the Middle Grades Through Collaborative Problem Solving
Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461745 · Cited by 143
Cited by
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258 · Cited by 1,262
Self-citationPerceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes.
Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.43 · Cited by 869
Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8 · Cited by 802
Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: a meta-analysis
Huang, C. (2013) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 811-831
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2037868325
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660310805
- The paper
- Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.