Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects

Anderman, Eric M., Young, Allison J.·1994·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

This study examines individual and classroom‐level differences in motivation and strategy usage in sixth‐ and seventh‐grade middle school science. Results suggest that students who experience academic difficulties differ from both high achieving and special education students on measures of self‐efficacy, goal orientation, expectancy, value, and self‐concept of ability in science, with students who experience academic difficulties occasionally demonstrating less adaptive patterns of motivation and cognition than special education students in science. We used hierarchical linear modeling to examine between‐classroom differences in learning‐focused goal orientation. Findings indicate that students who have science teachers that use ability‐focused instructional practices (e.g., pointing out the best students as an example to others) are less learning focused, and exhibit a diminished relation between self‐concept of ability and being learning focused in science. Implications for science education reform are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.3660310805

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
811-831
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W2037868325
Cited by
418
References
6
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660310805
The paper
Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310805

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.