Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: a meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For Self-concept general academics, no association between sex differences and living conditions was found.
“No association between sex differences and living conditions was found.”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Huang, 2013
The one new-analysis study on general academic self-efficacy showed no sex difference.
“The one study in the new analyses that investigated Self-concept general academics (general academic self-efficacy) showed no sex difference (Huang, 2013).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Huang, 2013
New analyses indicated that sex differences favoring men are smaller in countries with higher living conditions in Self-concept STEM, focusing specifically on math and computer self-efficacy.
“However, the new analyses indicated that sex differences favoring men are smaller in countries with higher living conditions in Self-concept STEM, focusing specifically on math and computer self-efficacy (Huang, 2013).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Huang, 2013
Males show higher Self-concept STEM than females, with SMDs of 0.10-0.33.
“Considering both the old analyses and new analyses, we found that males show higher Self-concept STEM (SMDs = 0.10–0.33; Else-Quest et al., 2010; Goldman & Penner, 2016; Huang, 2013; Stoet & Geary, 2018).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Huang, 2013
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925 · see citing works
Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings
Pajares, F. (1996) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170653 · Cited by 4,688 · see citing works
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635 · see citing works
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553 · see citing works
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Orwin’s (1983) fail-safe number was utilized to estimate the number of missing studies needed to reduce mean effect size in the studies.”
MethodThe Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3 · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022002186017002006 · Cited by 1,154 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, personal achievement is emphasized in individualist cultures (Hofstede 1984), whereas common interest is emphasized in collective cultures (Hui and Triandis 1986).”
BackgroundModeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Gender Differences in Self-Concept and Psychological Well-Being in Old Age: A Meta-Analysis
Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/56.4.p195 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations
Huang, C. (2011) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Self-citationInternet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis
Huang, C. (2010) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0217 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences
Archer, J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12507 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Li, L., Gao, H., & Xu, Y. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104001 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., Mastronarde, A. J., Patrick, S. D., Zhang, J., & Druckman, J. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.006 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Nuutila, K., Tuominen, H., Tapola, A., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Niemivirta, M. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.003 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox
Herlitz, A., Hönig, I., Hedebrant, K., & Asperholm, M. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231202685 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Luo, T., So, W. W. M., Li, W. C., & Yao, J. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09882-0 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
AL-Qadri, A. H., Mouas, S., Saraa, N., & Boudouaia, A. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00253-5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Trajectories in quantitative and humanities self-efficacy during the first year of college
Han, J., Usher, E. L., & Brown, C. S. (2021) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102054 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, C.
- Affiliations
- National Changhua University of Education (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Chiungjung
- ORCID
- Huang, Chiungjung
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychology of Education
- Published
- 2012-01-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-5174
- OpenAlex
- W2074641516
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- gender differences, academic self-efficacy, mathematics self-efficacy, computer self-efficacy, age differences, late adolescence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
