The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current opportunities and challenges in skeletal muscle tissue engineering
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this article is to give a concise review of the current state of the art in tissue engineering (TE) of skeletal muscle and the opportunities and challenges for future clinical applicability. The endogenous progenitor cells of skeletal muscle, i.e. satellite cells, show a high proneness to muscular differentiation, in particular exhibiting the same characteristics and function as its donor muscle. This suggests that it is important to use an appropriate progenitor cell, especially in TE facial muscles, which have a exceptional anatomical and fibre composition compared to other skeletal muscle. Muscle TE requires an instructive scaffold for structural support and to regulate the proliferation and differentiation of muscle progenitor cells. Current literature suggests that optimal scaffolding could comprise of a fibrin gel and cultured monolayers of muscle satellite cells obtained through the cell sheet technique. Tissue-engineered muscle constructs require an adequate connection to the vascular system for efficient transport of oxygen, carbon dioxide, nutrients and waste products. Finally, functional and clinically applicable muscle constructs depend on adequate neuromuscular junctions with neural cells. To reach this, it seems important to apply optimal electrical, chemotropic and mechanical stimulation during engineering and discover other factors that influence its formation. Thus, in addition to approaches for myogenesis, we discuss the current status of strategies for angiogenesis and neurogenesis of TE muscle constructs and the significance for future clinical use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellular and Molecular Dynamics in the Foreign Body Reaction
Luttikhuizen, D. T., Harmsen, M. C., & Luyn, M. J. A. V. (2006) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955 · Cited by 396
Self-citation
Cited by
Conducting Polymers for Tissue Engineering
Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2018) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00276 · Cited by 835
Peripheral nerve regeneration: Experimental strategies and future perspectives
Faroni, A., Mobasseri, S. A., Kingham, P. J., & Reid, A. J. (2015) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.010 · Cited by 592
Guo, B., Qu, J., Zhao, X., & Zhang, M. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.008 · Cited by 339
Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: methods to form skeletal myotubes and their applications
Ostrovidov, S., Hosseini, V., Ahadian, S., Fujie, T., Parthiban, S. P., Ramalingam, M., Bae, H., Kaji, H., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0534 · Cited by 302
Chal, J., Al Tanoury, Z., Hestin, M., Gobert, B., Aivio, S., Hick, A., Cherrier, T., Nesmith, A. P., Parker, K. K., & Pourquié, O. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.110 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Koning, M., Harmsen, M. C., van Luyn, M. J. A., & Werker, P. M. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 407-415
- ISSN
- 1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7005
- OpenAlex
- W2084568553
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current opportunities and challenges in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/term.190
- The paper
- Koning, M., Harmsen, M. C., van Luyn, M. J. A., & Werker, P. M. N. (2009). Current opportunities and challenges in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.