The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a Plurilingual Approach in English Language Teaching: Softening the Boundaries Between Languages
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1080/13670050.2013.777392 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540‐4781.2011.01206.x · DOI
- Cenoz J., Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy
- 10.1111/j.1467‐1770.1992.tb01044.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3587717 · DOI
- 10.1080/14790710902846723 · DOI
- Council of Europe, 2001, Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment
- Council of Europe, 2007, Guide for the development of language education policies in Europe. From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education
- Cummins J., 2007, Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms, Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 221
- 10.1075/aals.8 · DOI
- 10.2167/lcc345.0 · DOI
- European Commission, 2012, First European survey on language competences: Final report
- Gorter D.(2013).Multilingual interaction and minority languages: Proficiency and language practices in education and society.Language Teaching. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000481 · DOI
- 10.1080/01434632.1985.9994221 · DOI
- Little D., 2011, The European Language Portfolio: The story so far (1991–2011)
- 10.1080/14790710902846715 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teaching English through pedagogical translanguaging
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2020) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/weng.12462 · Cited by 335
Self-citationTeachers’ Beliefs about Multilingualism in a Course on Translanguaging
Gorter, D., & Arocena, E. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102272 · Cited by 168
Self-citationTeaching minoritized students: Are additive approaches legitimate?
Cummins, J. (2017) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/1943-5045-87.3.404 · Cited by 153
Liu, J. E., Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102276 · Cited by 132
T(w)o and fro: using the L1 as a language teaching tool in the CLIL classroom
Gallagher, F., & Colohan, G. (2017) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.947382 · Cited by 43
“Background Re-thinking the monolingual principle In recent years, the ‘monolingual principle’ (Howatt 1984: 135) in language teaching has been challenged (Cenoz and Gorter 2013; Cummins 2007, 2009a; Cook 2001).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D.
- Affiliations
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Ikerbasque (ES)
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-16
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 591-599
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7249
- OpenAlex
- W1967291772
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 22.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles
- Eusko Jaurlaritza
- Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- plurilingualism, English language teaching, language boundaries, plurilingual pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review