Cited by 191Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingGlobal trade and economicsEconomic Growth and Productivity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The adoption and diffusion of imported technology: the case of korea

Enos, John L., Park, W. H.·1988·The International Executive

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tie.5060300208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Enos, J. L., & Park, W. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
The International Executive
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-01
Volume
30
Issue
2-3
Pages
23-25
ISSN
  • 0020-6652 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-709X
OpenAlex
W2087396892
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Executive (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
technology diffusion, technology adoption, imported technology, technology transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review