Cited by 11Innovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsSocial Acceptance of Renewable Energy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feasibility of piezoelectric tiles adoption: A case study at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) Malaysia

Abstract

The basic function of an international airport is an aerodrome, provides not only the facilities for flights management, but also for customs and passport control. Nowadays, most of the international airports have established commercial outlets for food, products and services. As such, these airports are built with larger scale and more sophisticated on both infrastructure and infostructure which aim to be the most extensive air-travel service providers that connect the nations to the international gateways. Looking at the daily operations of an international airport, the energy consumption is apprehended to be enormous. Besides, knowing the fact that reliance on fossil fuels to power the airport buildings and to run the operations daily, this has led to many negative socioenvironmental implications. To date, some of the world major international airports have begun in renewable energy adoption-which mainly focused on solar energy as a way to reduce fossil energy consumption and towards greenhouse gases reduction. Inspired by thinking differently since solar energy has been adopted in Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) in 2014, through this study we proposed another form of renewable energy-piezoelectric technology adoption into our KLIA as a feasibility study. We believe that piezoelectric technology could complement the renewable energy mix, by tapping the crowd kinetic energy gathered internally in the airport buildings particularly at a few main entrances. Hence, the objectives of this study are (a) to examine the potential factors that will foster piezoelectric tiles adoption at KLIA and (b) to propose the ways for KLIA in speeding up piezoelectric tiles adoption within the airport terminals. The case study on the Malaysia Airports Holding Berhad (MAHB which manages the KLIA) was based on primary data collected through a series of qualitative focus group conducted on 14 (8 senior managers and 6 technical professionals) who were interested and supportive of this research project. Besides, secondary data are reviewed to obtain more comprehensive understanding on the KLIA operations and to triangulate the primary data collected. The research began in September 2014 and completed in June 2016. The main reason we opted for qualitative studies is to comply with the criteria of inductive approach, whereby to validate this feasibility study. As a conclusion, there is possibility for piezoelectric tiles adoption at KLIA. The financial factor of the piezoelectric tiles is the conditional factor which has to be redesigned in order to attain the objective of good return on investment. What we strongly believe, once the piezoelectric tiles have been adopted in KLIA, this innovation would put a big leap for KLIA and MAHB, one step close towards materialising a greener Malaysian international airport.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4976873

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Chew, B. C. 2012. TEMIF: A Decision Making for Technology Selection and Technology Adoption. [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/2028721/TEMIF_A_Decision_Making_Model_for_Technology_Selection_Technology_Adoption_2012_ [Accessed on 1st April 2016].
  2. Morse, L.C. and Babcock, D. L. 2013. Managing Engineering and Technology. 6th edition. Prentice Hall. Ch. 9.
  3. Rogers, E. M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. 1st ed. New York. Free Press of Glencoe.
  4. Rogers E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press.
  5. Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th edition). Thousand Oaks, C.A. Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chew, B. C., Loo, H. S., Bohari, I. A., Hamid, S. R., Sukri, F. H., & Kusumarwadani, R.
Affiliations
State University of Semarang (ID)
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher
Author(s)
Published
2017
Volume
1818
Pages
020009
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592516366
Cited by
11
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Keywords
piezoelectric tiles, piezoelectric energy harvesting, airport energy consumption, renewable energy adoption, Kuala Lumpur International Airport, airport terminal, return on investment, technology adoption barriers, airport management, feasibility study, sustainable airports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review