Cited by 58Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

Protective effects of folic acid on PM2.5-induced cardiac developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos by targeting AhR and Wnt/β-catenin signal pathways: YUE et al.

Yue, Cong, Ji, Cheng, Zhang, Hang, Zhang, Leshuai W., Tong, Jian, Jiang, Yan, Chen, Tao·2017·Environmental Toxicology

Abstract

Our previous observations indicated that extractable organic matter (EOM) from PM2.5 induced malformations in the heart of zebrafish embryos by activating AhR and inhibiting canonical Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway. As a nutritional factor, folic acid (FA) is reported to prevent cardiac defects during embryo development. Hence, we hypothesize that FA may prevent PM2.5-induced heart defects by interfering with AhR and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Our results showed that FA supplementation alleviated the EOM-induced heart defects in zebrafish embryos, and both AhR inhibitor CH223191 and Wnt activator CHIR99021 enhanced the protective efficiency of FA. Furthermore, FA supplementation attenuated the EOM-induced upregulation of AhR and its target genes including Cyp1a1, Cyp1b1, Ahrra, and Ahrrb. EROD assay confirmed that the EOM agonized Cyp1a1 activity was diminished by FA. The EOM-induced downregulation of β-catenin and its target genes including Nkx2.5, Axin2, Sox9b, and Cox2b were recovered or even overexpressed in embryos exposed to EOM plus FA. In conclusion, our study suggested that FA supplementation protected against PM2.5 cardiac development toxicity by targeting AhR and Wnt/β-catenin signal pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tox.22448

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yue, C., Ji, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, L. W., Tong, J., Jiang, Y., & Chen, T.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Yan
  • Chen, Tao
Venue
Environmental Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-19
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
2316-2322
ISSN
1520-4081 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2736915537
Cited by
58
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nature Sciences Foundation of China (81570284, 31300969)
  • The Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Keywords
folic acid, PM2.5, extractable organic matter, zebrafish embryos, AhR signaling pathway, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, Nkx2.5, sox9b, CH223191, CHIR99021, air pollution cardiotoxicity
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Animals, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Folic Acid, Heart, Zebrafish, Signal Transduction, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, Particulate Matter, Cytochrome P-450 CYP1B1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review