The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intra‐ and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To assess intra‐ and interobserver variability of fetal biometry measurements throughout pregnancy. Methods: A total of 175 scans (of 140 fetuses) were prospectively performed at 14–41 weeks of gestation ensuring an even distribution throughout gestation. From among three experienced sonographers, a pair of observers independently acquired a duplicate set of seven standard measurements for each fetus. Differences between and within observers were expressed in measurement units (mm), as a percentage of fetal dimensions and as gestational age‐specific Z‐scores. For all comparisons, Bland–Altman plots were used to quantify limits of agreement. Results: When using measurement units (mm) to express differences, both intra‐ and interobserver variability increased with gestational age. However, when measurement of variability took into account the increasing fetal size and was expressed as a percentage or Z‐score, it remained constant throughout gestation. When expressed as a percentage or Z‐score, the 95% limits of agreement for intraobserver difference for head circumference (HC) were ± 3.0% or 0.67; they were ± 5.3% or 0.90 and ± 6.6% or 0.94 for abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL), respectively. The corresponding values for interobserver differences were ± 4.9% or 0.99 for HC, ± 8.8% or 1.35 for AC and ± 11.1% or 1.43 for FL. Conclusions: Although intra‐ and interobserver variability increases with advancing gestation when expressed in millimeters, both are constant as a percentage of the fetal dimensions or when reported as a Z‐score. Thus, measurement variability should be considered when interpreting fetal growth rates. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus ultrasound examination results are highly dependent on the training, experience and skill of the sonographer [23].”
From Deep Learning Strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Self-citationBeckett, A. H., Rowland, M., & TURNER, P. (1965) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91037-8 · Cited by 16,917
4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why?
Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., & Zupan, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71048-5 · Cited by 3,670
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
Brennan, P., & Silman, A. J. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491 · Cited by 999
Bland, M., & Altman, D. G. (1990) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-f · Cited by 689
Self-citationRobinson, H. P. (1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5883.28 · Cited by 392
Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements*
Chitty, L. S., Altman, D. G., Henderson, A., & Campbell, S. C. (1994) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x · Cited by 323
Self-citationCharts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements
Chitty, L. S., Altman, D. G., Henderson, A., & Campbell, S. (1994) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13077.x · Cited by 272
Self-citationCharts of fetal size: 4. Femur length
Chitty, L. S., Altman, D. G., Henderson, A., & Campbell, S. C. (1994) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13078.x · Cited by 246
Self-citationWHO MONICA Project: Risk Factors
WHO MONICA Project, Keil, U., & Kuulasmaa, K. (1989) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/18.supplement_1.s46 · Cited by 200
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–194 of 194
Scale-aware Auto-context-guided Fetal US Segmentation with Structured Random Forests
Yang, X., Li, H., Liu, L., & Ni, D. (2020) · BIO Integration · doi:10.15212/bioi-2020-0016 · Cited by 6
Ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins
Lei, T., Zheng, J., Papageorghiou, A. T., Feng, J., Lin, M., Zhang, F., & Xie, H. (2020) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.14055 · Cited by 6
Self-citationYovo, E., Accrombessi, M., Agbota, G., Hocquette, A., Atade, W., Ladikpo, O. T., Mehoba, M., Degbe, A., Mombo‐Ngoma, G., Massougbodji, A., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262760 · Cited by 6
Koladjo, F., Yovo, E., Accrombessi, M., Agbota, G., Atade, W., Ladikpo, O. T., Mehoba, M., Degbe, A., Jackson, N., Massougbodji, A., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiac012 · Cited by 7
Diagnostic Plane Extraction from 3D Parametric Surface of the Fetal Cranium.
Namburete, A. I. L., Stebbing, R. V., & Noble, J. A. (2014) · MIUA · Cited by 6
Are ultrasound foetal circumference measurement methods interchangeable?
Dudley, N. J. (2019) · Ultrasound · doi:10.1177/1742271x19837307 · Cited by 5
Is Maternal Cardiovascular Performance Impaired in Altitude-Associated Fetal Growth Restriction?
Mundo, W., Toledo‐Jaldin, L., Heath-Freudenthal, A., Huayacho, J., Lazo‐Vega, L., Larrea-Alvarado, A., Miranda‐Garrido, V., Mizutani, R., MOORE, L. G., Moreno-Aramayo, A., et al. (2022) · High Altitude Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1089/ham.2022.0082 · Cited by 5
Balagalla, U. B., Jayasooriya, V., de Alwis, C., & Akila Subasinghe, A. (2023) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2023.2179343 · Cited by 6
AI to Assist in the Fetal Anomaly Ultrasound Scan: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Day, T. G., Matthew, J., Budd, S., Farruggia, A., Venturini, L., Wright, R., Jamshidi, B., To, M. S., Ling, H., Lai, J., et al. (2025) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2400747 · Cited by 5
Ambroise-Grandjean, G., Gabriel, P., Hossu, G., Zuily, S., Morel, O., & Berveiller, P. (2020) · Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2020.05.009 · Cited by 5
van den Heuvel, T. L. A., Petros, H., Santini, S., de Korte, C. L., & van Ginneken, B. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67552-7_13 · Cited by 5
Inter-observer variability in fetal biometric measurements
Kilani, R., Aleyadeh, W., Atileh, L. A., Suleimat, A. M. A., Khadra, M., & Hawamdeh, H. M. (2018) · Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2017.12.006 · Cited by 5
Heidweiller‐Schreurs, C. A. V., de Boer, M. A., van der Meij, K. R. M., Bax, C. J., de Groot, C. J. M., & Henneman, L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216052 · Cited by 5
Is accuracy of estimated fetal weight improved by better image quality scores?
Ambroise-Grandjean, G., Gall, L. L., Bourguignon, L., Collin, A., Hossu, G., & Morel, O. (2022) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.14447 · Cited by 4
Logan, C. A., Weiss, J. M., Reister, F., Rothenbacher, D., & Genuneit, J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26440-2 · Cited by 4
Impact of customized growth curves on screening for small for gestational age twins
Cordiez, S., Deruelle, P., Drumez, É., Bodart, S., Subtil, D., Houfflin‐Debarge, V., & Garabédian, C. (2017) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.001 · Cited by 4
Martins, J. G., Kawakita, T., Jain, P., Gurganus, M. M., Baraki, D. I., Barake, C., Sinkovskaya, E. S., & Abuhamad, A. (2022) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06495-3 · Cited by 4
Comparaison pragmatique des courbes de biométries fœtales élémentaires
Dhombres, F., & Massoud, M. (2023) · Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2023.09.003 · Cited by 4
Recommandations de la CNEOF 2022 – synthèse
Benoist, G., Bessis, R., Canh, M. B. T., Bohl, I., Bouhanna, P., Boukobza, P., Chami, M., Dhombres, F., Garel, C., Godard, P., et al. (2023) · Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2023.01.006 · Cited by 4
Sarker, M. M. K., Mishra, D., Alsharid, M., Hernandez-Cruz, N., Ahuja, R., Patey, O. V., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Noble, J. A. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103758 · Cited by 3
Self-citationHousehold income, fetal size and birth weight: an analysis of eight populations
Turner, S., Posthumus, A. G., Steegers, E. A. P., AlMakoshi, A., Sallout, B. I., Rifas‐Shiman, S. L., Oken, E., Kumwenda, B., Alostad, F., Wright-Corker, C., et al. (2022) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2021-218112 · Cited by 3
Use of focus point for plane acquisition to improve reproducibility in fetal biometry
Vignola, S., Donadono, V., Cavalli, C., Azzaretto, V., Casagrandi, D., Pandya, P. P., & Napolitano, R. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.27436 · Cited by 3
Conversano, F., Trani, M. G. D., Morello, R., Bottino, A., Pisani, P., Vimercati, A., Paola, M. D., & Casciaro, S. (2024) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.022 · Cited by 3
The Difficult Design of Epidemiologic Studies on Zika Virus and Pregnancy
Harville, E. W., Althabe, F., Bréart, G., & Buekens, P. M. (2016) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/ppe.12312 · Cited by 3
Haluzani, S., Lungu, A., Mudenda, M., Hamapa, A. M., Mkandawire, C., Kaluba, A., Khondowe, O., Mutale, M., Imasiku, K., Nyirenda, M., et al. (2024) · WFUMB Ultrasound Open · doi:10.1016/j.wfumbo.2024.100057 · Cited by 2
Direct estimation of fetal biometry measurements from ultrasound video scans through deep learning
Płotka, S., Pustelnik, K., Szenejko, P. I., Żebrowska, K., Rzucidło-Szymańska, I., Szymecka-Samaha, N., Łęgowik, T., Kosińska–Kaczyńska, K., Korzeniowski, P., Biliński, P., et al. (2025) · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM · doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101623 · Cited by 2
Mei, M., Li, Y., An, X., Ỹe, Z., & Mei, L. (2025) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2025.105533 · Cited by 2
A robust and data-efficient deep learning model for cardiac assessment without segmentation
Artman, C. M., & Henao, R. (2025) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-01903-x · Cited by 2
A multicentre benchmark dataset for comprehensive landmark-based fetal ultrasound biometry
Vece, C. D., Mao, Z., Avisdris, N., Dromey, B., Napolitano, R., Bashat, D. B., Vasconcelos, F., Stoyanov, D. V., Joskowicz, L., & Bano, S. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47854-3 · Cited by 3
Larsen, M. L., Greisen, G. O., Krebs, L., Hoei‐Hansen, C. E., & Petersen, O. B. (2026) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/ppe.70159 · Cited by 2
MRI-Derived Fetal Weight Estimation in the Midpregnancy Fetus: A Method Comparison Study
Matthew, J., Skelton, E., Story, L., Davidson, A., Knight, C. L., Gupta, C., Pasupathy, D., & Rutherford, M. (2021) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000519115 · Cited by 2
Nori, W., Akram, W., Abdulqader, S. K., & Alhaidari, T. K. (2024) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-024-01735-0 · Cited by 2
Gkamprana, A. M., Despotidi, A., Maroudias, G., Michalitsi, V., Papantoniou, N. E., & Pergialiotis, V. (2020) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/01443615.2020.1798904 · Cited by 2
Ali, S., Byanyima, R. K., Ononge, S., Ictho, J., Nyamwiza, J., Loro, E. L. E., Mukisa, J., Musewa, A., Nalutaaya, A., Ssenyonga, R., et al. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1769-2 · Cited by 2
Neural Modeling of Fetal Biometric Parameters for Detection of Fetal Abnormality
Rawat, V., Jain, A., Shrimali, V., & Raghuwansi, S. (2019) · IETE Journal of Research · doi:10.1080/03772063.2019.1565948 · Cited by 2
Are there specific factors associated with prenatally undiagnosed foetal macrosomia?
Ouazana, M., Girault, A., Goffinet, F., & Lepercq, J. A. (2020) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101802 · Cited by 2
Gameraddin, M. B., Hussein, R., Malik, B. A., Yousef, M., & Alshammari, Q. T. (2018) · Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.4103/tjog.tjog_72_17 · Cited by 2
Hairunpijit, S., Siripongsakun, S., Chotipanich, C., Hiranrat, P., Narkwichean, A., & Laosooksathit, W. (2022) · Obstetrics and Gynecology International · doi:10.1155/2022/2625242 · Cited by 1
Automatic Facial Axes Standardization of 3D Fetal Ultrasound Images
Alomar, A., Rubio, R., Salort, L., Albaigés, G., Payà, A., Piella, G., & Sukno, F. M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73647-6_9 · Cited by 2
Automatic Fetal Segmentation Designed on Computer-Aided Detection with Ultrasound Images
Govindarajan, M. P. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.055536 · Cited by 2
Seara, S. T., Erroz, I. O., Arias, D. P., Pradel, Z. G., Delgado-Nicolás, S., Pérez-Pérez, A., Rodríguez-Ozcoidi, J., Lavilla-Oíz, A., Bravo, M. C., Banda-Montalvo, L. L., et al. (2024) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2024-327196 · Cited by 1
Ambroise-Grandjean, G., Dap, M., Ciofolo, C., Rouet, L., Damas, Y., Banasiak, C., Bourguignon, L., Collin, A., Morel, O., & Hossu, G. (2025) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70041 · Cited by 2
AGE-US: Automated Gestational Age Estimation Based on Fetal Ultrasound Images
Parga, C. D., Nuñez‐Garcia, M., Carreira, M. J., Bernardino, G., & Vila-Blanco, N. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99568-2_7 · Cited by 1
Denk, M. C., Bertin, M., Donadono, V., Kangesu, L., Yulia, A., Ushakov, F. B., Pandya, P. P., & Napolitano, R. (2025) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.70137 · Cited by 1
Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the biometric measurements in pregnancy
Elger, T., Bettecken, K., Prodan, N., Sonek, J., Hoopmann, M., & Kagan, K. O. (2026) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-026-08351-0 · Cited by 1
Pekdemir, Ö., Karaböce, B., & Korkmaz, H. (2026) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2026.109859 · Cited by 1
Li, Z.-H., Weng, H.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Zhao, X.-Y., Gao, G., Huang, K., Chen, M.-L., Tao, F., Hu, C., & Zhang, X.-J. (2026) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2026.124844 · Cited by 1
Zhang, C., & Lin, Y. (2026) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/ppe.70186 · Cited by 1
Turner, S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801383-0.00011-6 · Cited by 1
Arechvo, A., Lingman, G., Thurn, L., Jansson, T. T., & Jokubkiene, L. (2021) · Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajum.12246 · Cited by 1
Siena, G., di Nardo, F., Contiero, B., & Milani, C. (2023) · Veterinary Research Communications · doi:10.1007/s11259-023-10120-2 · Cited by 1
Modeling the Neonatal Brain Development Using Implicit Neural Representations
Bieder, F., Friedrich, P., Corbaz, H., Durrer, A., Wolleb, J., & Cattin, P. C. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74561-4_1 · Cited by 1
Laurent, A.-C., Blanc, J., & Grangé, G. (2015) · Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément/Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.05.002 · Cited by 1
Quantifying Simulated Contamination Deposition on Healthcare Providers Using Image Analysis
Lin, Y., Cheng, A., Pirie, J., Davidson, J. M., Levy, A. R., Matava, C. T., Aubin, C., Robert, É., Buyck, M., Hecker, K. G., et al. (2022) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000664 · Cited by 1
AIR POLLUTION AND REPEATED ULTRASOUND MEASURES OF FETAL GROWTH IN MEXICO CITY
O’Neill, M. S., Sánchez, B. N., Rivera-González, L. O., Montoya, J. B., Martínez, N., & Vadillo‐Ortega, F. (2011) · ISEE Conference Abstracts · doi:10.1289/isee.2011.01897 · Cited by 1
Diagnostic significance of ultrasonographic score in detection of gestational diabetes mellitus
Perović, M. (2012) · doi:10.2298/bg20120713perovic · Cited by 1
Damaraju, N., Xavier, A., Vijayram, R., Desiraju, B. K., Misra, S., Khurana, A., Wadhwa, N., GARBH-Ini Study Group, Rengaswamy, R., Thiruvengadam, R., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.10.02.21264450 · Cited by 1
Spencer, R. N., Maksym, K., Hecher, K., Maršál, K., Figueras, F., Ambler, G., Whitwell, H. J., Nene, N. R., Sebire, N. J., Hansson, S. R., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.01.27.23285087 · Cited by 1
Retard de croissance intra-utérin et fœtus petits pour l'âge gestationnel
Radu, G. L., & Harika, G. (2015)
Rawat, V., Jain, A., Shrimali, V., & Raghuvanshi, S. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99810-7_6
Second Trimester and Late-Pregnancy Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction
Napolitano, R., & Martinelli, P. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316181898.014
MEASUREMENT OF AMNIOTIC FLUID VOLUME- GRAY-SCALE VERSUS COLOUR DOPPLER ULTRASOUND
Nabahati, M., Zeinalzadeh, M., Saber, M. A., Mehraeen, R., Ghaemian, N., & Mahboobi, A. (2018) · Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences · doi:10.14260/jemds/2018/1133
Interobserver reliability of sonographic fetal biometry in second trimester maternal serum screening
Aksoy, H., Özyurt, S., Aksoy, Ü., Özdamar, Ö., Mutlu, E. N. Ç., Tutuş, Ş., Babayiğit, M. A., & Açmaz, G. (2017) · Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.12891/ceog3246.2017
Évaluation d’un outil de mesure avec affichage de la norme en temps réel pour les biométries fœtales
Maretti-Reheis, L., Séverac, F., Favre, R., & Sananès, N. (2020) · Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2020.03.012
Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
LEES, C. C., Visser, G. H. A., & Hecher, K. (2018)
Rajaram, N., Thelen, B. J., Hamilton, J. D., Zheng, Y., Morgan, T., Funes‐Lora, M. A., Yessayan, L., Shih, A. J., Henke, P. K., Osborne, N. H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15960
Saleem, M. A., Bacha, R., Fatima, H., Fatima, M., Raheel, M., Taj, Z., & Manzoor, I. (2022) · Pakistan BioMedical Journal · doi:10.54393/pbmj.v5i6.500
Fetal biometry and amniotic fluid volume assessment end-to-end automation using Deep LearningPreprint
Slimani, S., Slimani, S., Hounka, S., Mahmoudi, A., Laoudiyi, D., Saadi, H., Bouzyiane, A., Lamrissi, A., Jalal, M., Bouhya, S., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2239392/v1
Induction of labor in case of suspected macrosomia
Felis, S. (2023) · American Journal of Medical and Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.58372/2835-6276.1076
Gadekar, V. P., Damaraju, N., Xavier, A., Thakur, S. B., Vijayram, R., Desiraju, B. K., Misra, S., Bhatnagar, S., Wadhwa, N., Natchu, U. C. M., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia · doi:10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100362 · Cited by 1
Highresolution Net for Estimation of Fetal Growth Parameters from First Trimester Ultrasound Images
Sriraam, N., Chinta, B., Seshadri, S., & Suresh, S. (2024) · IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) · doi:10.1109/tencon61640.2024.10902669
Retard de croissance intra-utérin
Dhombres, F., & Jouannic, J. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-2-294-78421-7.00018-x
Ville, M. S., Grantz, K. L., Gleason, J. L., & Chen, Z. (2026) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.70180
Shtaiyat, A., & Younes, H. A. (2026) · International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (ICIPCN) · doi:10.1109/icipcn67432.2026.11438719
Biomarker estimation from medical images : segmentation-based and segmentation-free approaches
Zhang, J. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b7a14877zbf9cz4b9cza3dez50e1f164a611
Automatic detection of the fetal brain midsagittal plane on MRI using a deep learning pipeline
Zhao, Z., Grévent, D., Vaillant, S., Xu, M., Bussières, L., Salomon, L. J., & Corroënne, R. (2026) · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM · doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101962
Hu, X., Mei, L., Dong, L., Ye, Z., Wang, D., & Lei, C. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11462848
Nagabotu, V., Prasanna, K. S. L., Bikku, T., Pujari, J. J., Kota, S. K., Shanmugasundaram, P., & Thota, S. (2026) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-026-06924-1
Mohan, A. (2026) · Journal of diagnostic medical sonography · doi:10.1177/87564793261428478 · Cited by 1
An end-to-end pipeline for automated fetal brain segmentation and biometry from 3D SSFP MRI
Modarai, Y., Lim, A., Lo, J., Wagner, M. W., Miller, E., Vidarsson, L., Ertl-Wagner, B., & Sussman, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1870124
AnomExpert: Identifying and Selecting Anatomical Planes for Prenatal Ultrasound Anomaly Diagnosis
Wang, J., Yang, Y., Pan, Z., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Ni, D. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38091-3_8
Ultrasound fetal biometry: number needed to audit
Dudley, N. J., & Platten, D. J. (2026) · Ultrasound · doi:10.1177/1742271x261464686
Mazek, M., Ciebiera, M., & Massalska, D. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15166274
Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Imaging
Alghamdi, B. M., Alrewily, E. M., & Alghamdi, S. S. (2026) · Ultrasound Quarterly · doi:10.1097/ruq.0000000000000753
Özsoy, H. G. T., Şen, E. E., Urfalı, F. E., Aydın, G. A., Akyüz, B., & Dandıl, E. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15187127 · Cited by 2
Cârlig, O., Iovoaica-Rămescu, C., Jurma, F. C., & Iliescu, D. G. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16183063
Hu, X., Dong, L., Zhang, L., Ye, Z., Wang, D., Mei, L., & Lei, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38082-1_14
Zhang, W., Liu, N., Qin, Q., Huang, X., Tan, C., Hu, W., & Bai, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38082-1_3
Comparison of U-Net and nnU-Net for Fetal Head Segmentation
Perić, A., Janković, J., Grgić, M., & Božek, J. (2026) · International Symposium ELMAR (ELMAR) · doi:10.1109/elmar71231.2026.11712197
Alzubaidi, M. S., Muaz, R., Abbes, I., Alyafei, K. A., Househ, M., & Agus, M. (2026) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms69103.2026.00116
Tall, B., Ndoye, A. M., Dieng, S., Diatta, M., Gaye, A., Gassama, M. A., Cissé, M., Sow, A., Diallo, D., Guéyé, A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103306
Mureșan, M. C., Muresan, M. B., Dumitrascu-Biris, D., Popa, Z. L., & Cîtu, C. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16213442
Megahed, Y., Ducharme, R., Lee, I., Willner, I., Dick, K., Chan, A. D. C., WALKER, M. C., & Hawken, S. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.114244
Gilboa, I., Wertheimer, K.-O., Gabbai, D., Tako, E., Lavie, A., Yogev, Y., & Attali, E. (2026) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.71409
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarris, I., Ioannou, C., Chamberlain, P., Ohuma, E., Roseman, F., Hoch, L., Altman, D. G., Papageorghiou, A. T., & for the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21 Century (INTERGROWTH‐21)
- Affiliations
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Papageorghiou, A. T.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-27
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 266-273
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2013364878
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant ID# 49038, 49038)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Keywords
- fetal biometry, intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, fetal ultrasound measurement, gestational age, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, Z-score, fetal growth assessment, measurement agreement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biometry, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetal Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
