Cited by 162Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsConnective tissue disorders researchCongenital limb and hand anomalies

Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias by combining two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound and intrauterine three-dimensional helical computer tomography

Ruano, R., Molho, M., Roume, J., Ville, Y.·2004·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of new imaging techniques in the prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia. METHODS: Between May and October 2003, a prospective study was conducted in a single referral center. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) and three-dimensional helical computer tomography (3D-HCT) were performed after two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) in six cases of skeletal dysplasia. Diagnostic accuracy and detailed findings with each of the three techniques were compared with postnatal radiological findings. RESULTS: There were three cases of achondroplasia, two cases of osteogenesis imperfecta type II and one case of chondrodysplasia punctata. Termination of pregnancy was performed in five cases and one fetus with osteogenesis imperfecta type II was delivered at term by Cesarean section. 2D-US made the correct diagnosis in four cases. 3D-US and 3D-HCT achieved an accurate diagnosis in all six cases. 3D-HCT and 3D-US identified significantly more abnormalities than did 2D-US (3D-HCT: 94.3% (33/35); 3D-US: 77.1% (27/35); 2D-US: 51.4% (18/35); P < 0.01). The diagnosis was made between 27 and 36 weeks' gestation in all cases. The advantage of 3D-HCT over 3D-US was the possibility of imaging the entire fetus. CONCLUSION: 3D-US and 3D-HCT seem to be useful complementary methods to 2D-US, and may improve accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis of skeletal disorders. These new imaging technologies may have a role in the prenatal multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.1113

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruano, R., Molho, M., Roume, J., & Ville, Y.
Affiliations
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
Corresponding author
Ville, Y.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-27
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
134-140
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1967695449
Cited by
162
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
Keywords
prenatal diagnosis, fetal skeletal dysplasia, 3D ultrasound, two-dimensional ultrasound, achondroplasia, osteogenesis imperfecta type II, chondrodysplasia punctata, diagnostic accuracy, abortion, fetal imaging
MeSH terms
Chondrodysplasia Punctata, Female, Fetal Diseases, Humans, Musculoskeletal Abnormalities, Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prospective Studies, Radiography, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review