Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non‐invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects

Open access
Benn, P., Cuckle, H., Pergament, E.·2013·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Non‐invasive prenatal testing ( NIPT ) for aneuploidy using cell‐free DNA in maternal plasma is revolutionizing prenatal screening and diagnosis. We review NIPT in the context of established screening and invasive technologies, the range of cytogenetic abnormalities detectable, cost, counseling and ethical issues. Current NIPT approaches involve whole‐genome sequencing, targeted sequencing and assessment of single nucleotide polymorphism ( SNP ) differences between mother and fetus. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of NIPT for Down and Edwards syndromes, and possibly Patau syndrome, in high‐risk women. Universal NIPT is not cost‐effective, but using NIPT contingently in women found at moderate or high risk by conventional screening is cost‐effective. Positive NIPT results must be confirmed using invasive techniques. Established screening, fetal ultrasound and invasive procedures with microarray testing allow the detection of a broad range of additional abnormalities not yet detectable by NIPT . NIPT approaches that take advantage of SNP information potentially allow the identification of parent of origin for imbalances, triploidy, uniparental disomy and consanguinity, and separate evaluation of dizygotic twins. Fetal fraction enrichment, improved sequencing and selected analysis of the most informative sequences should result in tests for additional chromosomal abnormalities. Providing adequate prenatal counseling poses a substantial challenge given the broad range of prenatal testing options now available. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.12513

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Benn, P., Cuckle, H., & Pergament, E.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-24
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
15-33
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1638606089
Cited by
326
References
4
FWCI
45.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.12513
The paper
Benn, P., Cuckle, H., & Pergament, E. (2013). Non‐invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12513

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.