Accuracy of first-trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of a previously developed model for the first-trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. METHODS: This was a prospective validation study of screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by assessment of a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency, fetal heart rate and serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation in 108 982 singleton pregnancies undergoing routine care in three maternity hospitals. A previously published algorithm was used to calculate patient-specific risks for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in each patient. The detection rate (DR) and false-positive rate (FPR) at estimated risk cut-offs from 1 in 2 to 1 in 1000 were determined. The proportions of trisomies detected were compared to their expected values in different risk groups. RESULTS: In the study population, there were 108 112 (99.2%) cases with normal fetal karyotype or birth of a phenotypically normal neonate and 870 (0.8%) cases with abnormal karyotype, including trisomy 21 (n = 432), trisomy 18 (n = 166), trisomy 13 (n = 56), monosomy X (n = 63), triploidy (n = 35) or other aneuploidy (n = 118). The screen-positive rates, standardized according to the maternal age distribution in England and Wales in 2011, of fetuses with abnormal or normal karyotype were compatible with those predicted from the previous model; at a risk cut-off of 1 in 100, the FPR was about 4% and the DRs for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 were 90%, 97% and 92%, respectively. There was evidence that the algorithm overestimated risk. This could, to some degree, reflect under-ascertainment in pregnancies ending in miscarriage or stillbirth. CONCLUSION: In a prospective validation study, the first-trimester combined test detected 90%, 97% and 92% of trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively, as well as > 95% of cases of monosomy X and triploidies and > 50% of other chromosomal abnormalities, at a FPR of 4%. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
First-trimester scans have contributed significantly to the timely assessment of chromosomal abnormalities, allowing for early decision-making and intervention opportunities.
“The first-trimester scans has also contributed significantly to the timely assessment of chromosomal abnormalities, allowing for early decision-making and intervention opportunities [5].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2018) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.14831 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Santorum, M., Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Karagioti, N., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04-26
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 714-720
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2517572309
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fetal Medicine Foundation (1037116)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Keywords
- first-trimester combined test, prenatal screening, Down syndrome, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, nuchal translucency, free beta-hCG, PAPP-A, fetal heart rate, risk prediction algorithm, detection rate, false positive rate, aneuploidy, monosomy X, triploidy, stillbirth
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18, Down Syndrome, Female, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Maternal Age, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Trisomy, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human, Nuchal Translucency Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review