Cited by 362Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Spatio‐temporal image correlation (STIC): new technology for evaluation of the fetal heart

Open access
DeVore, G. R., Falkensammer, P., Sklansky, M. S., Platt, L. D.·2003·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Spatio‐temporal image correlation (STIC) is a new approach for clinical assessment of the fetal heart. It offers an easy to use technique to acquire data from the fetal heart and to aid in visualization with both two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional (3D) cine sequences. The acquisition is performed in two steps: first, images are acquired by a single, automatic volume sweep. Second, the system analyzes the image data according to their spatial and temporal domain and processes an online dynamic 3D image sequence that is displayed in a multiplanar reformatted cross‐sectional display and/or a surface rendered display. The examiner can navigate within the heart, re‐slice, and produce all of the standard image planes necessary for a comprehensive diagnosis. The advantages of STIC for use in evaluation of the fetal heart are as follows: the technique delivers a temporal resolution which corresponds to a B‐mode frame rate of approximately 80 frames/s; it provides the examiner with an unlimited number of images for review; it allows for correlation between image planes that are perpendicular to the main image acquisition plane; it may shorten the evaluation time when complex heart defects are suspected; it enables the reconstruction of a 3D rendered image that contains depth and volume which may provide additional information that is not available from the thin multiplanar image slices (e.g. for pulmonary veins, septal thickness); it lends itself to storage and review of volume data by the examiner or by experts at a remote site; it provides the examiner with the ability to review all images in a looped cine sequence. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.217

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeVore, G. R., Falkensammer, P., Sklansky, M. S., & Platt, L. D.
Affiliations
  • General Electric (Austria) (AT)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
DeVore, G. R.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
380-387
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2039207139
Cited by
362
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
spatiotemporal image correlation, fetal echocardiography, three-dimensional ultrasound imaging, multiplanar reconstruction, surface rendering, congenital heart disease, temporal resolution
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Heart, Gestational Age, Heart Defects, Congenital, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Artifacts, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review