ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography
Open accessAbstract
sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system.Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography Clinical Standards CommitteeThe International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) is a scientific organization that encourages sound clinical practice, and high-quality teaching and research related to diagnostic imaging in women's healthcare.The ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee (CSC) has a remit to develop Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements as educational recommendations that provide healthcare practitioners with a consensus-based approach, from experts, for diagnostic imaging.They are intended to reflect what is considered by ISUOG to be the best practice at the time at which they are issued.Although ISUOG has made every effort to ensure that Guidelines are accurate when issued, neither the Society nor any of its employees or members accepts any liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements issued by the CSC.The ISUOG CSC documents are not intended to establish a legal standard of care, because interpretation of the evidence that underpins the Guidelines may be influenced by individual circumstances, local protocol and available resources.Approved Guidelines can be distributed freely with the permission of ISUOG (info@isuog.org).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abnormal head shape can lead to inaccurate estimates of fetal age when BPD is used; in these cases, HC measurements are more reliable.
“This finding can also lead to inaccurate estimates of fetal age when the BPD is used; in these cases, HC measurements are even more reliable 20,21 .”
From <scp>ISUOG</scp> Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Two axial planes, commonly referred to as the transventricular and transthalamic planes, permit visualization of the cerebral structures relevant to the anatomical integrity of the brain.
“Two axial planes, commonly referred to as the transventricular and transthalamic planes, permit visualization of the cerebral structures relevant to the anatomical integrity of the brain (Figure 2).”
From <scp>ISUOG</scp> Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Other views of the fetal spine may identify other spinal malformations, including vertebral anomalies and sacral agenesis.
“Other views of the fetal spine may identify other spinal malformations, including vertebral anomalies and sacral agenesis 20 .”
From <scp>ISUOG</scp> Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 301
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wimberger-Prayer D. Fetal MRI. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
- Authors
- Malinger, G., Paladini, D., Haratz, K. K., Monteagudo, A., Pilu, G. L., & Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 476-484
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W3082665019
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 32.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2022-10-02)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Tel Aviv University
- Università di Bologna
- School of Medicine, New York University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
- Keywords
- fetal neurosonography, fetal central nervous system, prenatal screening, fetal brain ultrasound, fetal neuroanatomy
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review