The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the sonographic features of transverse lower‐segment uterine Cesarean section scars in non‐pregnant, premenopausal women and to identify factors associated with scar deficiency. Methods: Non‐pregnant, premenopausal women with histories of previous transverse lower‐segment Cesarean sections, who were referred for an ultrasound scan for a variety of gynecological indications, were included in this study. An attempt was made to identify the uterine scars on transvaginal ultrasound scan and to describe their locations and morphological features. Various demographic, clinical and ultrasound data were examined in order to identify factors associated with deficient scars. Deficient scars were defined as detectable myometrial thinning at the site of the Cesarean section scar. Results: Lower‐segment uterine scars were detected in 321/324 (99.1%; 95% CI, 98.0–100) women with a history of previous Cesarean section. Sixty‐three (19.4%; 95% CI, 15.1–23.8) women had evidence of deficient Cesarean scars. Using multivariate analysis, a history of multiple Cesarean sections, uterine retroflexion and the inability to visualize all Cesarean scars in women with previous multiple Cesarean sections were all shown to be significantly associated with deficient scars. Conclusion: Deficient uterine scars are a frequent finding in women with a history of previous Cesarean section. The risk of scar deficiency is increased in women with a retroflexed uterus and in those who have undergone multiple Cesarean sections. Copyright © 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta
Miller, D. A., Chollet, J. A., & Goodwin, T. M. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70463-0 · Cited by 1,106
Jurkovic, D., Hillaby, K., Woelfer, B., Lawrence, A., Salim, R., & Elson, C. J. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.56 · Cited by 785
Self-citationPlacenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section.
Clark, S. L., Koonings, P. P., & Phelan, J. P. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 712
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy
Zelop, C. M., Harlow, B. L., Frigoletto, F. D., Safon, L. E., & Saltzman, D. H. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90779-0 · Cited by 341
The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity
Gilliam, M. (2002) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02002-1 · Cited by 181
Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery
Jolly, J., Walker, J. J., & Bhabra, K. (1999) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08235.x · Cited by 142
First-Trimester Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Evolving Into Placenta Previa/Accreta at Term
Ben Nagi, J., Ofili-Yebovi, D., Marsh, M., & Jurkovic, D. (2005) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.2005.24.11.1569 · Cited by 99
Self-citationPrimary cesarean section and subsequent fertility
LaSala, A. P., & Berkeley, A. S. (1987) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80177-1 · Cited by 44
Castaneda, S., Karrison, T., & Cibils, L. A. (2000) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm.2000.064 · Cited by 43
Sonographic appearance of uterine scar dehiscence
Bromley, B., Pitcher, B. L., Klapholz, H., LICHTER, E. D., & Benacerraf, B. R. (1995) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/0020-7292(95)80009-2 · Cited by 32
Cited by
Bij de Vaate, A. J. M., van der Voet, L. F., Naji, O., Witmer, M., Veersema, S., Brölmann, H. A. M., Bourne, T., & Huirne, J. A. F. (2014) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.13199 · Cited by 481
Placenta accreta: Pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease
Jauniaux, E., & Jurkovic, D. (2012) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2011.11.010 · Cited by 432
Self-citationNew insights into the etiopathology of placenta accreta spectrum
Jauniaux, E., Jurkovic, D., Hussein, A. M., & Burton, G. J. (2022) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.038 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ofili‐Yebovi, D., Ben‐Nagi, J., Sawyer, E., Yazbek, J., Lee, C., Gonzalez, J., & Jurkovic, D.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-77
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2107286738
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.5200
- The paper
- Ofili‐Yebovi, D., Ben‐Nagi, J., Sawyer, E., Yazbek, J., Lee, C., Gonzalez, J., & Jurkovic, D. (2008). Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.