Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors

Open access
Ofili‐Yebovi, D., Ben‐Nagi, J., Sawyer, E., Yazbek, J., Lee, C., Gonzalez, J., Jurkovic, D.·2008·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To examine the sonographic features of transverse lower‐segment uterine Cesarean section scars in non‐pregnant, premenopausal women and to identify factors associated with scar deficiency. Methods: Non‐pregnant, premenopausal women with histories of previous transverse lower‐segment Cesarean sections, who were referred for an ultrasound scan for a variety of gynecological indications, were included in this study. An attempt was made to identify the uterine scars on transvaginal ultrasound scan and to describe their locations and morphological features. Various demographic, clinical and ultrasound data were examined in order to identify factors associated with deficient scars. Deficient scars were defined as detectable myometrial thinning at the site of the Cesarean section scar. Results: Lower‐segment uterine scars were detected in 321/324 (99.1%; 95% CI, 98.0–100) women with a history of previous Cesarean section. Sixty‐three (19.4%; 95% CI, 15.1–23.8) women had evidence of deficient Cesarean scars. Using multivariate analysis, a history of multiple Cesarean sections, uterine retroflexion and the inability to visualize all Cesarean scars in women with previous multiple Cesarean sections were all shown to be significantly associated with deficient scars. Conclusion: Deficient uterine scars are a frequent finding in women with a history of previous Cesarean section. The risk of scar deficiency is increased in women with a retroflexed uterus and in those who have undergone multiple Cesarean sections. Copyright © 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.5200

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Ofili‐Yebovi, D., Ben‐Nagi, J., Sawyer, E., Yazbek, J., Lee, C., Gonzalez, J., & Jurkovic, D.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-06
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
72-77
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2107286738
Cited by
296
References
10
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.5200
The paper
Ofili‐Yebovi, D., Ben‐Nagi, J., Sawyer, E., Yazbek, J., Lee, C., Gonzalez, J., & Jurkovic, D. (2008). Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.