The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between prior cesarean delivery and placenta previa. METHODS: A hospital-based, case-control study was conducted in which 316 multiparous women with placenta previa were identified. Controls consisted of 2051 multiparous women with spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Information on prior cesarean delivery was examined in three forms: as a dichotomous variable, as an ordinal variable, and as a set of three indicator variables for one, two, and three or more cesarean deliveries. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to obtain an adjusted estimate of this association. RESULTS: Women with a prior cesarean delivery were more likely to have a placenta previa than those without (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21, 2.08). The likelihood of placenta previa increased as both parity and number of cesarean deliveries increased. Thus, the adjusted OR for a primiparous woman with one cesarean delivery was 1.28 (95% CI 0.82, 1.99). For a woman who has four or more deliveries with only a single cesarean delivery, the OR increases to 1.72 (95% CI 1.12, 2.64). This trend continues with greater parity and a greater number of cesarean deliveries such that the likelihood of placenta previa for a woman with parity greater than four and greater than four cesarean deliveries was OR 8.76 (95% CI 1.58, 48.53). CONCLUSION: This study supports the association between prior cesarean delivery and placenta previa and demonstrates that the joint effect of parity and prior cesarean delivery is greater than that of either variable alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries
Silver, R. M., Landon, M. B., Rouse, D. J., Leveno, K. J., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E. A., Moawad, A. H., Caritis, S. N., Harper, M., Wapner, R. J., et al. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000219750.79480.84 · Cited by 1,909
Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review
Marshall, N. E., Fu, R., & Guise, J.-M. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035 · Cited by 565
External cephalic version for breech presentation before term
Hutton, E. K., & Hofmeyr, G. J. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000084.pub2 · Cited by 317
Elective Primary Cesarean Delivery
Minkoff, H., & Chervenak, F. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb022734 · Cited by 305
Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors
Ofili‐Yebovi, D., Ben‐Nagi, J., Sawyer, E., Yazbek, J., Lee, C., Gonzalez, J., & Jurkovic, D. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5200 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilliam, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 976-980
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095009106
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02002-1
- The paper
- Gilliam, M. (2002). The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02002-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.