The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Correct assessment of gestational age and fetal growth is essential for optimal obstetric management. The objectives of this study were, first, to develop charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy based on crown–rump length and biparietal diameter and, second, to derive reference curves for normal fetal growth based on biparietal diameter, head circumference, transverse cerebellar diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length from 10 weeks of gestational age onwards. Methods: A total of 8313 pregnant women were included for analysis in this population‐based prospective cohort study. All women had repeated ultrasound assessments to examine fetal growth. Results: Charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy, based on crown–rump length and biparietal diameter, were derived. Internal validation with the actual date of delivery showed that ultrasound imaging provided reliable gestational age estimates. Up to 92% of deliveries took place within 37–42 weeks of gestation if gestational age was derived from ultrasound data, compared with 87% based on a reliable last menstrual period. The earlier the ultrasound assessment the more accurate the prediction of date of delivery. After 24 weeks of gestation a reliable last menstrual period provided better estimates of gestational age. Reference curves for normal fetal growth from 10 weeks of gestational age onwards were derived. Conclusions: Charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and reference curves for fetal biometry are presented. The results indicate that, up to 24 weeks of pregnancy, dating by ultrasound examination provides a better prediction of the date of delivery than does last menstrual period. The earlier the ultrasound assessment in pregnancy, preferably between 10 and 12 weeks, the better the estimate of gestational age. Copyright © 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology
Royston, P., Ambler, G., & Sauerbrei, W. (1999) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/28.5.964 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010
Jaddoe, V. W. V., van Duijn, C. M., van der Heijden, A. J., Mackenbach, J. P., Moll, H. A., Steegers, E. A. P., Tiemeier, H., Uitterlinden, A. G., Verhulst, F. C., & Hofman, A. (2010) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9516-7 · Cited by 1,027
Self-citationCommittee Opinion No. 700: Methods for estimating the due date
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002046 · Cited by 683
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan
(2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12342 · Cited by 621
The Generation R Study: Design and cohort update 2012
Jaddoe, V. W. V., van Duijn, C. M., Franco, O. H., van der Heijden, A. J., van IIzendoorn, M. H., de Jongste, J. C., van der Lugt, A., Mackenbach, J. P., Moll, H. A., Raat, H., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9735-1 · Cited by 546
Risk factors and outcomes of maternal obesity and excessive weight gain during pregnancy
Gaillard, R., Durmuş, B., Hofman, A., Mackenbach, J. P., Steegers, E. A. P., & Jaddoe, V. W. V. (2013) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.20088 · Cited by 490
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Verburg, B. O., Steegers, E. A. P., De Ridder, M., Snijders, R. J. M., Smith, E., Hofman, A., Moll, H. A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., & Witteman, J. C. M.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03-17
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 388-396
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2111954313
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.5225
- The paper
- Verburg, B. O., Steegers, E. A. P., De Ridder, M., Snijders, R. J. M., Smith, E., Hofman, A., Moll, H. A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., & Witteman, J. C. M. (2008). New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.