Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of pre‐eclampsia by uterine artery Doppler imaging: relationship to gestational age at delivery and small‐for‐gestational age

Open access
Yu, C. K. H., Khouri, O., Onwudiwe, N., Spiliopoulos, Y., Nicolaides, K. H.·2008·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the relationship between pre‐eclampsia, small‐for‐gestational age (SGA) and gestational age at delivery, and the effect of this relationship on the prediction of pre‐eclampsia by uterine artery Doppler imaging. Methods: This was a multicenter prospective Doppler study of the uterine artery at 22–24 weeks of gestation in unselected women with singleton pregnancies. Results: In the 30 639 pregnancies examined, the median uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) was 1.0 and the 95th centile was 1.58. In 614 (2%) cases the woman developed pre‐eclampsia and in this group there was an inverse significant association between the gestational age at delivery and prevalence of SGA (r = − 0.99, P < 0.0001), and between the gestational at delivery and mean uterine artery PI (r = − 0.51, P < 0.0001) and prevalence of mean uterine artery PI above the 95th centile (r = − 0.99, P < 0.0001). The mean uterine artery PI was above the 95th centile in 77.2% of women who developed pre‐eclampsia requiring delivery before 34 weeks, in 35.9% of those delivering at 34–37 weeks and in 21.9% of those delivering after 37 weeks. The respective percentages were 82.3%, 46.9% and 28.8% for those with pre‐eclampsia and SGA, and 43.8%, 21.2% and 8.4% for those with SGA but without pre‐eclampsia. Conclusions: Pre‐eclampsia requiring early delivery is more likely to be associated with SGA than less severe pre‐eclampsia in women who deliver at term. Doppler ultrasound assessment of the uterine arteries is more effective in identifying pre‐eclampsia requiring preterm than term delivery. Copyright © 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.5252

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Yu, C. K. H., Khouri, O., Onwudiwe, N., Spiliopoulos, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-04
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
310-313
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1983465521
Cited by
183
References
0
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of pre‐eclampsia by uterine artery Doppler imaging: relationship to gestational age at delivery and small‐for‐gestational age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.5252
The paper
Yu, C. K. H., Khouri, O., Onwudiwe, N., Spiliopoulos, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2008). Prediction of pre‐eclampsia by uterine artery Doppler imaging: relationship to gestational age at delivery and small‐for‐gestational age. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5252

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.