The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice
Abstract
Environmental justice is a major movement and organizing discourse in the environmental politics arena, and both the movement and the idea have had a large influence on the way that climate justice has been conceptualized. While most discussions of climate justice in the academic literature focus on ideal conceptions and normative arguments of justice theory, or on the pragmatic policy of the more elite environmental nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), a distinct discourse has developed out of the grassroots. In these movement articulations of climate justice, the concerns and principles of environmental justice are clear and consistent. Here, climate justice focuses on local impacts and experience, inequitable vulnerabilities, the importance of community voice, and demands for community sovereignty and functioning. This review traces the discourse of environmental justice from its development, through the range of principles and demands of grassroots climate justice movements, to more recent articulations of ideas for just adaptation to climate change. This article is categorized under:Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Global Justice Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Social Movements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse
Schlosberg, D. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationPetheram, L., Zander, K. K., Campbell, B. M., High, C., & Stacey, N. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.05.002 · Cited by 206
Cited by
Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions
Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8 · Cited by 405
Urban Heat Management and the Legacy of Redlining
Wilson, B. (2020) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1759127 · Cited by 285
From Urban Resilience to Abolitionist Climate Justice in Washington, DC
Ranganathan, M., & Bratman, E. (2021) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12555 · Cited by 230
Foster, S., Leichenko, R., Nguyen, K. H., Blake, R., Kunreuther, H., Madajewicz, M., Petkova, E. P., Zimmerman, R., Corbin‐Mark, C., Yeampierre, E., et al. (2019) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14009 · Cited by 102
TOWARDS A POSTCOLONIAL PERSPECTIVE ON CLIMATE URBANISM
Robin, E., & Broto, V. C. (2021) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12981 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-374
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2132214484
- Cited by
- 1,374
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.