Cited by 230Environmental Justice and Health DisparitiesDisaster Management and ResilienceFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

From Urban Resilience to Abolitionist Climate Justice in Washington, DC

Ranganathan, Malini, Bratman, Eve·2021·Antipode

Abstract

What would abolitionism mean for climate justice? “Resilience” is proposed by experts as a solution to climate change vulnerability. But this prescription tends to focus on adaptation to future external threats, subtly validating embedded processes of racial capitalism that have historically dehumanised and endangered residents and their environments in the first place. This article focuses on majority Black areas said to be vulnerable to extreme weather events and targeted for expert‐driven resilience enhancements in America's capital city, Washington, DC . Drawing on key insights from Black radical, feminist, and antiracist humanist thought, we reimagine resilience through an abolitionist framework. Using archival analysis, oral histories, a neighbourhood‐level survey, and interviews conducted between 2015 and 2018, we argue that abolitionist climate justice entails a centring of DC 's historical environmental and housing‐related racisms, the intersectional drivers of precarity and trauma experienced by residents beyond those narrowly associated with “climate”; and an ethics of care and healing practiced by those deemed most at risk to climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anti.12555

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranganathan, M., & Bratman, E.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • Franklin & Marshall College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ranganathan, Malini
  • Bratman, Eve
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-28
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
115-137
ISSN
  • 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8330
OpenAlex
W2954508113
Cited by
230
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3
FWCI
37.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antipode (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
abolitionism, climate justice, urban resilience, racial capitalism, Black communities, environmental racism, intersectionality, precarity, trauma, care ethics, healing, Washington, D.C.

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review