Terror Management Theory and mortality awareness: A missing link in climate response studies?
Abstract
Adaptation and mitigation efforts are hampered by multiple obstacles and thus lag behind climate changes' speed and scope. Some of the most powerful obstacles to climate action are the social‐psychological factors that influence human thought, preferences, and behaviors. These factors, including those articulated by environmental psychology generally, and Terror Management Theory (TMT) specifically, are neglected within climate response research. TMT underlies an extensive and well‐established literature; researchers have shown that efforts to repress one's mortality awareness, triggered when people are explicitly or implicitly reminded of their unavoidable death, influences individuals' attitudes and behavior. These psychological defenses, including denial, distraction and worldview defense, sometimes produce counter‐intuitive and potentially counter‐productive outcomes. Meanwhile, the growing global awareness and media coverage of climate change, and much scholarly research, has skewed toward negative “disaster and death” narratives. Exposure to such stimuli, highlighting climate change's potentially life‐threatening effects, may exacerbate counter‐productive responses. In this thought experiment, we propose that mortality awareness could be a critical variable that helps explain climate action at the individual and societal levels. We survey TMT insights, focusing on the relationship between mortality reminders and human responses. We then identify how climate change may lead to increased mortality awareness and consider the psychological defenses triggered by this awareness. We argue that mortality defenses may both limit and advance climate action. Finally, we set out an agenda for TMT‐climate response research and discuss the potential to advance several inquiry lines, including climate change communication, collective action and the capacity for transformational responses. This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700506 · Cited by 3,216 · see citing works
Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352321 · Cited by 1,188 · see citing works
Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability
Pal, J. S., & Eltahir, E. A. B. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2833 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Psychological research and global climate change
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P. C., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Steg, L., Swim, J., & Bonnes, M. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2622 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Young people's burden: requirement of negative CO <sub>2</sub> emissions
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., von Schuckmann, K., Beerling, D. J., Cao, J., Marcott, S., Masson-Delmotte, V., Prather, M. J., Rohling, E. J., et al. (2017) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-8-577-2017 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Mortality Salience Motivates the Defense of Environmental Values and Increases Collective Ecoguilt
Harrison, P. R., & Mallett, R. K. (2013) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0070 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
An Appreciative View of the Brighter Side of Terror Management Processes
Vail, III, & Juhl, J. (2015) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci4041020 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety
Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434 · Cited by 1,196 · see citing works
Thoma, M. V., Rohleder, N., & Rohner, S. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.675936 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Smith, L. K. M., Ross, H. C., Shouldice, S. A., & Wolfe, S. E. (2022) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.776 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationTürkarslan, K. K., Kozak, E. D., & Yıldırım, J. C. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102147 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolfe, S. E., & Tubi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Tubi, Amit
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2904895936
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada's Social Science and Humanities Research Council (#430-2012-0264)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- terror management theory, death awareness, climate change response, climate action, defense mechanisms, denial, distraction, worldview defense, climate change communication, collective action, climate change narratives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review