Cited by 33Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityClimate Change Communication and Perception

Mortality Salience Motivates the Defense of Environmental Values and Increases Collective Ecoguilt

Harrison, Patrick R., Mallett, Robyn K.·2013·Ecopsychology

Abstract

In highlighting the potentially catastrophic effects of environmentally harmful behavior, proenvironmental campaigns may inadvertently induce what social psychologists call mortality salience. An uncomfortable awareness of one's inevitable demise, mortality salience motivates individuals to act in line with important social values and to feel guilty when they fail to do so. Guilt, in turn, motivates proenvironmental behavior. It is unclear, however, whether individuals who do not value the environment are influenced by such appeals. The present research tests the conditions under which drawing attention to mortality increases environmental guilt (i.e., ecoguilt) among individuals who vary in their endorsement of proenvironmental values. We find that mortality salience increases ecoguilt when individuals who strongly endorse environmental values have those proenvironmental values made salient. In comparison, mortality salience does not influence ecoguilt for individuals who weakly endorse environmental values, regardless of whether environmental values are made salient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/eco.2012.0070

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harrison and Mallett (2013) found that the MS × Norm salience interaction effect on experiencing environmental guilt only occurred for people who strongly endorsed pro-environmental values.

    “In one study, Harrison and Mallett (2013), for example, found that the MS × Norm salience interaction effect on experiencing environmental guilt only occurred for people who strongly endorsed pro-environmental values.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, P. R., & Mallett, R. K.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
Ecopsychology
Published
2013-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
1942-9347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116217362
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecopsychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
mortality salience, environmental values, guilt, pro-environmental behavior, environmental campaigns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review