The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperconjugation
Abstract
This review outlines the ubiquitous nature of hyperconjugative interactions and their role in the structure and reactivity of organic molecules. After defining the common hyperconjugative patterns, we discuss the main factors controlling the magnitude of hyperconjugative effects, including orbital symmetry, energy gap, electronegativity, and polarizibility. The danger of underestimating the magnitude of hyperconjugative interactions are illustrated by a number of spectroscopic, conformational, and structural effects. Through the use of advanced computational techniques, the true role of hyperconjugative effects, as it pertains to their influence on stereoelectronics, conformational equilibria, and reactivities relative to other electronic effects, continue to be uncovered. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011 1 109–141 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.6 This article is categorized under:Structure and Mechanism > Molecular Structures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint
Reed, A. E., Curtiss, L. A., & Weinhold, F. (1988) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00088a005 · Cited by 17,359
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
On the calculation of bonding energies by the Hartree Fock Slater method
Ziegler, T., & Rauk, A. (1977) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/bf00551648 · Cited by 2,541
Modern physical organic chemistry
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-3398 · Cited by 2,312
Natural localized molecular orbitals
Reed, A. E., & Weinhold, F. (1985) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.449360 · Cited by 2,207
Morokuma, K. (1971) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1676210 · Cited by 1,900
Hobza, P., & Havlas, Z. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990050q · Cited by 1,817
An Appraisal of Valence-bond Structures and Hybridization in Compounds of the First-row elements.
Bent, H. A. (1961) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60211a005 · Cited by 1,509
Interaction of orbitals through space and through bonds
Hoffmann, R. (1971) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar50037a001 · Cited by 1,455
Hydrogen Bonding: A Theoretical Perspective
Scheiner, S. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195090116.001.0001 · Cited by 1,326
Cited by
Why Cyclooctatetraene Is Highly Stabilized: The Importance of “Two-Way” (Double) Hyperconjugation
Wu, J. I., Fernández, I., Mo, Y., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct3000553 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Alabugin, I. V., Gilmore, K. M., & Peterson, P. W.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Molecular Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-141
- ISSN
- 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0884
- OpenAlex
- W4211042738
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.