Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperconjugation

Alabugin, Igor V., Gilmore, Kerry M., Peterson, Paul W.·2011·WIREs Computational Molecular Science
DOI 10.1002/wcms.6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This review outlines the ubiquitous nature of hyperconjugative interactions and their role in the structure and reactivity of organic molecules. After defining the common hyperconjugative patterns, we discuss the main factors controlling the magnitude of hyperconjugative effects, including orbital symmetry, energy gap, electronegativity, and polarizibility. The danger of underestimating the magnitude of hyperconjugative interactions are illustrated by a number of spectroscopic, conformational, and structural effects. Through the use of advanced computational techniques, the true role of hyperconjugative effects, as it pertains to their influence on stereoelectronics, conformational equilibria, and reactivities relative to other electronic effects, continue to be uncovered. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011 1 109–141 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.6 This article is categorized under:Structure and Mechanism > Molecular Structures

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcms.6

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Alabugin, I. V., Gilmore, K. M., & Peterson, P. W.
Venue
WIREs Computational Molecular Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
109-141
ISSN
  • 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-0884
DOI
10.1002/wcms.6
OpenAlex
W4211042738
Cited by
268
References
77
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.