The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short‐term wind power production
Abstract
Short‐term (up to 2–3 days ahead) probabilistic forecasts of wind power provide forecast users with highly valuable information on the uncertainty of expected wind generation. Whatever the type of these probabilistic forecasts, they are produced on a per horizon basis, and hence do not inform on the development of the forecast uncertainty through forecast series. However, this additional information may be paramount for a large class of time‐dependent and multistage decision‐making problems, e.g. optimal operation of combined wind‐storage systems or multiple‐market trading with different gate closures. This issue is addressed here by describing a method that permits the generation of statistical scenarios of short‐term wind generation that accounts for both the interdependence structure of prediction errors and the predictive distributions of wind power production. The method is based on the conversion of series of prediction errors to a multivariate Gaussian random variable, the interdependence structure of which can then be summarized by a unique covariance matrix. Such matrix is recursively estimated in order to accommodate long‐term variations in the prediction error characteristics. The quality and interest of the methodology are demonstrated with an application to the test case of a multi‐MW wind farm over a period of more than 2 years. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
Cited by
Stochastic Energy Scheduling in Microgrids With Intermittent Renewable Energy Resources
Su, W., Wang, J., & Roh, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2280645 · Cited by 734
Antonopoulos, I., Robu, V., Couraud, B., Kirli, D., Norbu, S., Kiprakis, A., Flynn, D., Elizondo-Gonzalez, S., & Wattam, S. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109899 · Cited by 656
Wind Energy: Forecasting Challenges for Its Operational Management
Pinson, P. (2013) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/13-sts445 · Cited by 377
Self-citationManaging Electric Vehicles in the Smart Grid Using Artificial Intelligence: A Survey
Rigas, E. S., Ramchurn, S. D., & Bassiliades, N. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2014.2376873 · Cited by 280
Artificial Intelligence Enabled Demand Response: Prospects and Challenges in Smart Grid Environment
Khan, M. A., Saleh, A. M., Waseem, M., & Sajjad, I. A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3231444 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinson, P., Madsen, H., Nielsen, H. A., Papaefthymiou, G., & Klöckl, B.
- Venue
- Wind Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-22
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-62
- ISSN
- 1095-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1824
- OpenAlex
- W2113810680
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.