The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration
Open accessAbstract
There are dozens of studies made and ongoing related to wind integration. However, the results are not easy to compare. IEA WIND R&D Task 25 on ‘Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power’ collects and shares information on wind generation impacts on power systems, with analyses and guidelines on methodologies. In the state‐of‐the‐art report (October, 2007), and the final report of the 3 years period (July, 2009) the most relevant wind power grid integration studies have been analysed especially regarding methodologies and input data. Several issues that impact on the amount of wind power that can be integrated have been identified. Large balancing areas and aggregation benefits of wide areas help in reducing the variability and forecast errors of wind power as well as help in pooling more cost effective balancing resources. System operation and functioning electricity markets at less than day‐ahead time scales help reduce forecast errors of wind power. Transmission is the key to aggregation benefits, electricity markets and larger balancing areas. Best practices in wind integration studies are described. There is also benefit when adding wind power to power systems: it reduces the total operating costs and emissions as wind replaces fossil fuels and this should be highlighted more in future studies. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Notton, G., Nivet, M.-L., Voyant, C., Paoli, C., Darras, C., Motte, F., & Fouilloy, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.007 · Cited by 578
A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids
Heptonstall, P. J., & Gross, R. J. K. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00695-4 · Cited by 321
Data-driven predictive control for unlocking building energy flexibility: A review
Kathirgamanathan, A., De Rosa, M., Mangina, E., & Finn, D. P. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110120 · Cited by 321
On the economics of renewable energy sources
Edenhofer, O., Hirth, L., Knopf, B., Pahle, M., Schlömer, S., Schmid, E., & Ueckerdt, F. (2013) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.015 · Cited by 307
Challenges and barriers to demand response deployment and evaluation
Nolan, S., & O’Malley, M. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.083 · Cited by 292
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Holttinen, H., Meibom, P., Orths, A., Lange, B., O'Malley, M., Tande, J. O., Estanqueiro, A., Gomez, E., Söder, L., Strbac, G., Smith, J. C., & van Hulle, F.
- Venue
- Wind Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-192
- ISSN
- 1095-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1824
- OpenAlex
- W2107727835
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/we.410
- The paper
- Holttinen, H., Meibom, P., Orths, A., Lange, B., O'Malley, M., Tande, J. O., Estanqueiro, A., Gomez, E., Söder, L., Strbac, G., Smith, J. C., & van Hulle, F. (2011). Impacts of large amounts of wind power on design and operation of power systems, results of IEA collaboration. Wind Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.