Cited by 321Electric Power System OptimizationIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationPower Systems and Renewable Energy

A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids

Heptonstall, Philip J., Gross, Robert J. K.·2020·Nature Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-020-00695-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heptonstall, P. J., & Gross, R. J. K.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heptonstall, Philip J.
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2020-11-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
72-83
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097027128
Cited by
321
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 29
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S029575/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Keywords
variable renewable energy, wind energy, solar energy, power system flexibility, renewable energy penetration, decarbonization, least-cost energy planning, power system impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review