A method for determination of damping for edgewise blade vibrations
Abstract
Violent edgewise blade vibrations have in recent years been a large problem for some stall‐regulated wind turbines. Owing to the complexity of the phenomenon, it has been difficult to predict the risk of these vibrations with aeroelastic load prediction tools. One problem is the choice of parameters in the aeroelastic model, e.g. structural damping and aerodynamic aerofoil characteristics. In many cases a high degree of uncertainty in the predicted response exists and the need for experimental verification methods is obvious. In this work a new method to identify the effective damping for the edgewise blade mode shape for wind turbines has been developed. The method consists of an exciter mechanism which makes it possible to excite the edgewise blade mode shapes from the wind turbine nacelle. Furthermore, the method consists of an analysis method which enables a straightforward determination of the damping. The analysis method is based on a local blade whirl description of the edgewise blade vibrations. The method is verified on a Bonus wind turbine, and for this specific turbine the effective damping for edgewise blade vibrations has been determined. The results support the further development of aeroelastic models and show potential for fine‐tuning of parameters of importance for the edgewise blade vibration problem. Furthermore, the method can be used for experimental investigation of the risk of edgewise blade vibrations for a specific turbine. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sum of the structural damping and the aerodynamic damping can be less than zero.
“As a result, the sum of the structural damping and the aerodynamic damping can be less than zero [60].”
From Tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) for suppressing edgewise vibrations of wind turbine blades (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Structural control and vibration issues in wind turbines: A review
Xie, F., & Aly, A.-M. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110087 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Active tuned mass dampers for control of in-plane vibrations of wind turbine blades
Fitzgerald, B., Basu, B., & Nielsen, S. R. K. (2013) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.1524 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) for suppressing edgewise vibrations of wind turbine blades
Zhang, Z., & Fitzgerald, B. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110928 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thomsen, K., Petersen, J. T., Nim, E., Øye, S., & Petersen, B.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Thomsen, K.
- ORCID
- Thomsen, K.
- Venue
- Wind Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 233-246
- ISSN
- 1095-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1824
- OpenAlex
- W2011009587
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wind Energy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Danish Energy Agency (ENS 1363/98-0006; ENS 1363/00-0006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Wind Energy Research and Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics
- Keywords
- stall-regulated wind turbines, aeroelastic simulation, excitation mechanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review