Cited by 59Energy and Environment ImpactsInnovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentICT in Developing Communities

Solar home systems and solar lanterns in rural areas of the Global South: What impact?

Open access
Lemaire, Xavier·2018·WIREs Energy and Environment

Abstract

Assessing the extent of evidence available relating to the impact of solar energy for households (HHs) in developing countries, surveys are reviewed focusing on the impact of pico‐photovoltaic (e.g., solar lanterns) or solar home systems (SHS) on rural HHs and directly related economic activities of their occupiers. Ninety‐eight documents have been analyzed. Areas of enquiry have included the impact of small individual solar photovoltaic systems on different facets of the life of HHs' occupiers: their education, health, finance, livelihoods, and social relations. Research on the impact of small solar systems contradicts the commonly accepted idea that small solar systems—due to their limited capacity—cannot have an impact in terms of development. In actual fact, these systems seem to have a significant impact in terms of quality of life for their users and in helping them to keep connected to the global world by supplying power to mobile phones and television sets. Nevertheless, it is not yet possible to draw definitive conclusions on their quantitative impact in specific areas, except for: (a) evidence of increase of quality lighting, (b) strong evidence of cost savings when kerosene lamps are replaced by solar lighting, and (c) evidence on the impact of solar lighting on the time of studying of children and quality of education. Finally, indications are given on the kind of research which could be conducted to fill current gaps in demonstrating evidence of the impact of small individual solar systems. This article is categorized under:Photovoltaics > Climate and Environment Energy and Climate > Economics and Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wene.301

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies support that transitioning to solar lighting can bring benefits beyond pollution exposure reduction, including household savings, more income-generating activity, gender empowerment, social inclusion, and improved education from more homework time.

    “Other studies have corroborated that the potential benefits of a transition to solar lighting extend well beyond reductions in pollution exposure to include savings on household expenditures, increase in income generating activities, gender empowerment, social inclusion, and improved education due to more time spent on homework12,13.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [12]12. Blunck M. Electricity and Sustainable Development: Impact of Solar Home Systems in Rural Bangladesh, Diploma thesis, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, 2007.
  2. [19]19. Cornelissen W, Engelbertink J. Renewable Energy: Access and Impact -A Systematic Literature Review of the Impact on Livelihoods of Interventions Providing Access to Renewable Energy in Developing Countries, IOB Study, no. 376, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Netherlands, 2013.
  3. [21]21. Djamin M, Dasuki AS, Lubis AY, Alyuswar F. Applications of photovoltaic systems for increasing villager's income, Renewable Energy, 2001, 22 (1-3):263-267.
  4. [33]33. Gustavsson M. The impact of solar electric services on lifestyles -experiences from Zambia, Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 2004, 15 (1):10-15.
  5. [38]38. Halder PK, Parvez MdS. Financial Analysis and Social Impact of Solar Home Systems in Bangladesh: A Case Study. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, May 2015.
  6. [41]41. Harun A. The Role of Solar Home Systems (SHS) in Socio-economic Development of Rural Bangladesh, MA Thesis, BRAC University, 2015.
  7. [42]42. Hoque N, Kumar S. User perspectives of photovoltaic micro utility systems installed in rural Bangladesh, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 2015, 5 (3):708-715.
  8. [50]50. Khan SA, Abdul Malek Azad AKM. Social impact of Solar Home System in rural Bangladesh: a case study of rural zone, IAFOR Journal of Sustainability, Energy and the Environment, 2014, 1 (1):5-22.
  9. [59]59. Mair G. Sustainable Development through Efficient Energy Use: Impact Assessment of the OSRAM Off- Grid Project in Kenya Master Thesis, Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, 2009.
  10. [62]62. Mehta K. The Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of Solar Home Systems in Karnataka, India. MSc in Environmental Change and Management thesis, University of Oxford, 2004.
  11. [69]69. Mondal Md H, Chakrabarty S. 'Socio-economic impacts of the Solar Home Systems in Bangladesh', Conference on 'ideas and innovations for the development of Bangladesh', October 9-10, 2009, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
  12. [73]73. Monjur S. Financial Viability and Environmental Benefits of Solar Photovoltaic System in Rural Bangladesh, Dissertation, Dpt. of Economics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, 2015.
  13. [79]79. Obeng GY. Solar Photovoltaic Rural Electrification: Assessing Impacts on Energy Poverty and Quality of Life in Ghana, A PhD Thesis Submitted to the Department of Planning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 2008.
  14. [90]90. Rao ND, Argawal D, Wood D. A comparative study of electricity supply and benefits from microgrids, solar home systems and the grid in rural South Asia. In: Micro Perspectives for Decentralised Energy Supply Proceedings of the International Conference 2015:117-120.
  15. [103]103. Wamukonya N, Davis M. Socio-economic impacts of rural electrification in Namibia: comparisons between grid, solar and un-electrified households. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2001, 5 (3): 5-13. 103
  16. [107]107. Yarime M, Peters JK, Kiru SM. Introducing solar LED lanterns to rural Kenya: Sustainability assessment of environmental, economic, and social impacts. In: Micro Perspectives for Decentralised Energy Supply Proceedings of the International Conference. 2015, 125-129. 108

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemaire, X.
Affiliations
Energy Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Lemaire, Xavier
Venue
WIREs Energy and Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-12
Volume
7
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2041-8396 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-840X
OpenAlex
W2808671091
Cited by
59
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Energy and Climate Change
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
solar home systems, solar lanterns, rural households, off-grid solar power, household impact, cost reduction, livelihoods, quality of life, mobile phone connectivity, Global South

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review