The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revisiting an old friend: manganese‐based MRI contrast agents
Open accessAbstract
Non‐invasive cellular and molecular imaging techniques are emerging as a multidisciplinary field that offers promise in understanding the components, processes, dynamics and therapies of disease at a molecular level. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an attractive technique due to the absence of radiation and high spatial resolution which makes it advantageous over techniques involving radioisotopes. Typically paramagnetic and superparamagnetic metals are used as contrast materials for MR based techniques. Gadolinium has been the predominant paramagnetic contrast metal until the discovery and association of the metal with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in some patients with severe renal or kidney disease. Manganese was one of the earliest reported examples of paramagnetic contrast material for MRI because of its efficient positive contrast enhancement. In this review manganese based contrast agent approaches will be presented with a particular emphasis on nanoparticulate agents. We have discussed both classically used small molecule based blood pool contrast agents and recently developed innovative nanoparticle‐based strategies highlighting a number of successful molecular imaging examples. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2011 3 162–173 DOI: 10.1002/wnan.116 This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies Diagnostic Tools > In Vitro Nanoparticle-Based Sensing Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents
Busquets, M. A., Estelrich, J., & Sánchez-Martín, M. J. (2015) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s76501 · Cited by 622
Manganese-loaded lipid-micellar theranostics for simultaneous drug and gene delivery to lungs
Howell, M., Mallela, J., Wang, C., Ravi, S., Dixit, S., Garapati, U., & Mohapatra, S. (2013) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.029 · Cited by 65
Holmes, H. E., Powell, N. M., Ma, D., Ismail, O., Harrison, I. F., Wells, J. A., Colgan, N., O'Callaghan, J. M., Johnson, R. A., Murray, T. K., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2017.00020 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, D., Caruthers, S. D., Senpan, A., Schmieder, A. H., Wickline, S. A., & Lanza, G. M.
- Venue
- WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-21
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-173
- ISSN
- 1939-0041 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5116
- OpenAlex
- W1973436374
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting an old friend: manganese‐based MRI contrast agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wnan.116
- The paper
- Pan, D., Caruthers, S. D., Senpan, A., Schmieder, A. H., Wickline, S. A., & Lanza, G. M. (2011). Revisiting an old friend: manganese‐based MRI contrast agents. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.