The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most widely used and powerful tools for noninvasive clinical diagnosis owing to its high degree of soft tissue contrast, spatial resolution, and depth of penetration. MRI signal intensity is related to the relaxation times (T 1, spin-lattice relaxation and T 2, spin-spin relaxation) of in vivo water protons. To increase contrast, various inorganic nanoparticles and complexes (the so-called contrast agents) are administered prior to the scanning. Shortening T 1 and T 2 increases the corresponding relaxation rates, 1/T 1 and 1/T 2, producing hyperintense and hypointense signals respectively in shorter times. Moreover, the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved with the acquisition of a large number of measurements. The contrast agents used are generally based on either iron oxide nanoparticles or ferrites, providing negative contrast in T 2-weighted images; or complexes of lanthanide metals (mostly containing gadolinium ions), providing positive contrast in T 1-weighted images. Recently, lanthanide complexes have been immobilized in nanostructured materials in order to develop a new class of contrast agents with functions including blood-pool and organ (or tumor) targeting. Meanwhile, to overcome the limitations of individual imaging modalities, multimodal imaging techniques have been developed. An important challenge is to design all-in-one contrast agents that can be detected by multimodal techniques. Magnetoliposomes are efficient multimodal contrast agents. They can simultaneously bear both kinds of contrast and can, furthermore, incorporate targeting ligands and chains of polyethylene glycol to enhance the accumulation of nanoparticles at the site of interest and the bioavailability, respectively. Here, we review the most important characteristics of the nanoparticles or complexes used as MRI contrast agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications
Gupta, A. K., & Gupta, M. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 · Cited by 6,771
Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review
Maeda, H., Wu, J., Sawa, T., Matsumura, Y., & Hori, K. (2000) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00248-5 · Cited by 6,565
Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications
Caravan, P., Ellison, J. J., McMurry, T. J., & Lauffer, R. B. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr980440x · Cited by 4,483
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities
Desgrosellier, J. S., & Cheresh, D. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2748 · Cited by 3,736
Imaging in the era of molecular oncology
Weissleder, R., & Pittet, M. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06917 · Cited by 2,364
Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light
Massoud, T. F., & Gambhir, S. S. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1047403 · Cited by 2,216
Longmire, M., Choyke, P. L., & Kobayashi, H. (2008) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 · Cited by 2,149
Inorganic Nanoparticles for MRI Contrast Agents
Na, H. B., Song, I. C., & Hyeon, T. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200802366 · Cited by 1,781
Magnetic nanoparticle design for medical diagnosis and therapy
Mornet, S., Vasseur, S., Grasset, F., & Duguet, E. (2004) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b402025a · Cited by 1,745
Cited by
Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles
Ali, A., Zafar, H., Zia, M., ul Haq, I., Phull, A. R., Ali, J. S., & Hussain, A. (2016) · Nanotechnology, Science and Applications · doi:10.2147/nsa.s99986 · Cited by 1,591
Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle (IONP) Synthesis to Applications: Present and Future
Ajinkya, N., Yu, X., Kaithal, P., Luo, H., Somani, P., & Ramakrishna, S. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13204644 · Cited by 362
Advantages and Limitations of Current Techniques for Analyzing the Biodistribution of Nanoparticles
Arms, L., Smith, D. W., Flynn, J., Palmer, W., Martin, A., Woldu, A., & Hua, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00802 · Cited by 159
Nanoparticles: A New Approach to Upgrade Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Yu, Z., Gao, L., Chen, K., Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Li, Q., & Hu, K. (2021) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-021-03489-z · Cited by 138
Neurotheranostics as Personalized Medicines
Kevadiya, B. D., Ottemann, B. M., Thomas, M. B., Mukadam, I., Nigam, S., McMillan, J., Gorantla, S., Bronich, T. K., Edagwa, B., & Gendelman, H. E. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.10.011 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Busquets, M. A., Estelrich, J., & Sánchez-Martín, M. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nanomedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1727
- ISSN
- 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
- 1178-2013
- OpenAlex
- W2043768129
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 20.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/ijn.s76501
- The paper
- Busquets, M. A., Estelrich, J., & Sánchez-Martín, M. J. (2015). Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from simple to dual contrast agents. International Journal of Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s76501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.