Cited by 74Mental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health services

Priorities for mental health research in Europe: A survey among national stakeholders' associations within the ROAMER project

Open access
Fiorillo, Andrea, Luciano, Mario, Del Vecchio, Valeria, Sampogna, Gaia, Obradors‐Tarragó, Carla, Maj, Mario, on behalf of the ROAMER Consortium·2013·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Within the ROAMER project, funded by the European Commission, a survey was conducted with national associations/organizations of psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, users and/or carers, and psychiatric trainees in the 27 countries of the European Union, aiming to explore their views about priorities for mental health research in Europe. One hundred and eight associations/organizations returned the questionnaire. The five most frequently selected research priorities were early detection and management of mental disorders, quality of mental health services, prevention of mental disorders, rehabilitation and social inclusion, and new medications for mental disorders. All these areas, except the last one, were among the top ten research priorities according to all categories of stakeholders, along with stigma and discrimination. These results seem to support the recent argument that some rebalancing in favor of psychosocial and health service studies may be needed in psychiatric research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20052

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fiorillo, A., Luciano, M., Del Vecchio, V., Sampogna, G., Obradors‐Tarragó, C., Maj, M., & on behalf of the ROAMER Consortium
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Department of Psychiatry University of Naples SUN Naples Italy
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
165-170
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2051011424
Cited by
74
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Società Italiana di Psicopatologia
  • British Psychological Society
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, 282586, FP7/2007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mental health research priorities, stakeholder perspectives, early detection of mental disorders, mental health care quality, mental disorder prevention, psychotropic drugs, stigma and discrimination, psychosocial research, European Union

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review