The promise and challenges of drug repurposing in psychiatry
Open accessAbstract
The term "repurposing" literally means to give a new purpose or use to a drug. Some researchers have sub-classified repurposing into "reformulation", which is the development of a different formulation for the same drug, and "repositioning", which is the process of identifying a new therapeutic use for an already known drug1. One may argue that only repositioning is closely aligned with the term repurposing. Therefore, the focus of this paper will be only on the repositioning form of repurposing. Drug repurposing is viewed as an approach to rediscovering value in "old molecules" and finding new therapeutic uses, particularly in areas with high risk of failure, such as psychiatry. It is considered a cost-effective and de-risked strategy2: having already established the safety and tolerability of a compound diminishes the risks of further development. The importance of repurposing was recently acknowledged by the European Commission, which formed the Commission Expert Group on Safe and Timely Access to Medicines for Patients (STAMP). STAMP aims to recognize the importance of comprehensive investigation of different opportunities that a molecule could bring to patients, with faster development times, and at reduced costs and risk for pharmaceutical companies3. The scope and extent of drug repurposing in the central nervous system (CNS) area has been recently reviewed4. The authors performed an extensive search of compounds, with the initial and target indication and the type of repurposing strategy (repositioning, reformulation or both). Their study identified 118 source products which were repurposed 203 times, with 80 products repurposed once, 16 products repurposed twice and 22 products repurposed three times or more4. Among products repurposed multiple times, over two thirds (68%) came from the CNS area, and half of the new indications (102 cases) were approved3. Most of the cases were repositioned (N=171), while only 16 were reformulated, and 16 were reformulated and repositioned at the same time4. Among new therapeutic indications, Alzheimer's disease was targeted most often (22 cases), followed by substance dependence (alcohol, opioids, tobacco), bipolar disorder, depression, neuropathy/neuralgia, multiple sclerosis and schizophrenia, with 10 or more cases each4. A prototypical example of a repurposed drug in psychiatry is valproic acid/valproate5. The anticonvulsant properties of N-dipropylacetic acid (valproic acid) were discovered in 1967 and the drug quickly became widely used in epilepsy, generally in the form of sodium valproate. Antimanic and prophylactic activity in bipolar disorder was only subsequently demonstrated for both valproic acid and sodium valproate, with divalproex (an equimolar combination of valproic acid and sodium valproate) being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995 for this new indication5. Traditionally, there have been three major approaches to drug repurposing/repositioning. One approach is the discovery at the bedside, where a clinician observes/discovers the benefit in a given condition of a compound approved for a different condition. A classic example is bupropion for smoking cessation. Bupropion was first approved by the FDA for the treatment of depression in the 1980s. L. Ferry, at the time Chief of Preventive Medicine at the Loma Linda Veterans Hospital, and her colleagues tried the drug in the mid 1990s in a small group of smokers, with impressive results, as about half were able to quit smoking for at least a year. This led to a series of positive placebo-controlled trials and to the approval of bupropion for smoking cessation in 19976. Another approach involves leveraging the knowledge of the potential benefits of specific pharmacological actions in certain conditions, and identifying compounds initially developed for the treatment of other conditions and sharing similar pharmacological actions. A clear example of this is atomoxetine. This compound, a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, was originally developed for the treatment of depression and then abandoned despite good tolerability. T. Spencer, J. Biederman and colleagues, whose group at Massachusetts General Hospital had shown the efficacy in attention deficit disorder of desipramine7, a tricyclic antidepressant with norepinephrine reuptake inhibition properties, approached the maker of atomoxetine about testing it in this condition, and showed it to be effective8. Atomoxetine was subsequently approved by the FDA in December 2002 for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The third approach to drug repurposing comes from the advances in the understanding of the neurobiology and genetics of psychiatric disorders. The identification of specific neural pathways associated with certain genetic polymorphisms can lead to the use of approved compounds which have shown to affect those molecular targets. Alternatively, the identification of subtypes associated with specific
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The advent of LAIs appeared to overcome poor adherence but did not solve the widespread lack of adherence because LAIs remain largely underutilized.
“The advent of new long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) had appeared to overcome the issue of poor adherence [21–24], but did not solve the widespread lack of adherence, as these drugs still remain largely underutilized.”
From The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: A clinical review (2020) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study of Desipramine in the Treatment of ADD: I. Efficacy
Biederman, J., Baldessarini, R. J., WRIGHT, V., Knee, D., & Harmatz, J. S. (1989) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-198909000-00022 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Evergreening, patent challenges, and effective market life in pharmaceuticals
Hemphill, C. S., & Sampat, B. N. (2012) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.004 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Ferry, L. H., & Ja, J. (2003) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2003.tb10468.x · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Spencer, T., Biederman, J., Heiligenstein, J. H., Wilens, T. E., Faries, D. E., Prince, J. B., Faraone, S. V., Rea, J., Witcher, J. W., & Zervas, S. (2001) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1089/10445460152595577 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Griffiths, C. E. M., Fava, M., Miller, A. H., Russell, J., Ball, S. G., Xu, W., Acharya, N., & Rapaport, M. H. (2017) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000479163 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationMurteira, S., Ghezaiel, Z., Karray, S., & Lamure, M. P. (2013) · Journal of Market Access & Health Policy · doi:10.3402/jmahp.v1i0.21131 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Filling the gap in CNS drug development: evaluation of the role of drug repurposing
Caban, A., Pisarczyk, K., Kopacz, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Market Access & Health Policy · doi:10.1080/20016689.2017.1299833 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
When should the sequential parallel comparison design be used in clinical trials?
Baer, L., & Ivanova, A. (2013) · Clinical Investigation · doi:10.4155/cli.13.74 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
[Brief history of the development of valproate in bipolar disorders].
Lempérière, T. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Murteira S, Ghezaiel Z, Karray S et al. J Mark Access Health Policy 2013;1: 21131.
- Hemphill CS, Sampat BN. J Health Econ 2012;31:327-39.
- Caban A, Pisarczyk K, Kopacz K et al. J Mark Access Health Policy 2017;5: 1299833.
- Lemp erie `re T. Enc ephale 2001;27:365-72.
- Ferry L, Johnston JA. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57:224-30.
- Biederman J, Baldessarini RJ, Wright V et al. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psy- chiatry 1989;28:777-84.
- Spencer T, Biederman J, Heiligenstein J et al. J Child Adolesc Psychophar- macol 2001;11:251-65.
- Griffiths CEM, Fava M, Miller AH et al. Psychother Psychosom 2017;86:260-7.
- Baer L, Ivanova A. Clin Investig 2013;3:832-3. DOI:10.1002/wps.20481 World Psychiatry 17:1 -February 2018 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fiorillo, A., Barlati, S., Bellomo, A., Corrivetti, G., Nicolò, G., Sampogna, G., Stanga, V., Veltro, F., Maina, G., & Vita, A. (2020) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-020-00293-4 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Cavaleri, D., De Pietra, A., Gazzola, M., Crocamo, C., Bartoli, F., & Carrà, G. (2024) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107134 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fava, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA
- Venue
- World Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-29
- ISSN
- 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-5545
- PMC
- PMC5775121
- OpenAlex
- W2792278586
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 721567)
- ZonMw (91210020)
- Medical Research Council (1113400, 1078901)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1113400, 1078901, 1087889)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- drug repurposing, reformulation, psychiatry, central nervous system drugs, Alzheimer's disease, substance dependence, bipolar disorder, depression, neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, valproic acid, antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, antiepileptic drugs, drug safety and tolerability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review