Cited by 37Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Cognition and disability in schizophrenia: cognition‐related skills deficits and decision‐making challenges add to morbidity

Open access
Harvey, Philip D., Strassnig, Martin T.·2019·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Schizophrenia contributes 13.4 (95% UI: 9.9-16.7) million years of life lived with disability to the global burden of disease. Its societal costs are immense, with costs derived from productivity loss even larger than direct treatment costs, a pattern observed across different countries and health care systems. Based on these data, disability reduction in schizophrenia is a priority, yet there are few effective treatments available. Nonsocial and social cognitive impairment contributes substantially to reductions in everyday functioning and subjective quality of life in persons with schizophrenia. Green et al1 present and evaluate sophisticated models of the influence of nonsocial and social cognition on functioning, considering moderating variables (e.g., defeatist attitudes, motivation, reward sensitivity) as well as neurobiological correlates and their potential implications. Further, they thoroughly evaluate treatment efforts to date for these deficits, including pharmacological and remediation-based approaches. Among these efforts are exercise interventions, which target physical fitness and have been shown to have beneficial effects on cognitive performance. Just like with any other chronic disease process, there are multiple factors that contribute to the development of disability in schizophrenia. Obesity and health-related comorbidities are common. Physical fitness is visibly impaired. The presence of these elements shows a correlation with cognitive impairments2. One of the issues covered in less detail in Green et al's review is that of functional capacity (the ability to perform everyday functional skills) and its potential mediating effect between nonsocial and social cognition and functional outcomes. In several studies, functional capacity was found to be proximally related to impairments in everyday functioning, with the strongest predictor of deficits in this capacity generally being nonsocial cognition. In addition, when social functional capacity, generally referred to as social competence, is examined for its relationship to functional outcomes, it can be shown that some elements of social cognition predict performance on measures of social competence, which in turn predict informant ratings of everyday social functioning. Thus, impairments in nonsocial and social cognition may be a precursor to functional skills deficits, which then in turn predict impaired everyday outcomes across several domains. In a related vein, we have recently documented that correlates of poor physical health and fitness are important determinants of disability in schizophrenia that interact with nonsocial and social cognition to complicate functional outcomes. The end result of these physical impairments might prevent people from even leaving their residences and may exacerbate limitations in functional capacity beyond those originating from nonsocial and social cognitive deficits, while generating additional roadblocks to effective deployment of everyday skills that the patients might possess. We developed a model that integrates these different contributory paths into a unified model of disability in schizophrenia, attempting to isolate the pertinent individual factors (for example, symptoms, cognition, physical functioning) and their interactions, so that they can be approached in a synergistic manner3. In analyses of data from the Suffolk County Mental Health Project, we examined the 20-year course of weight gain and its impact on everyday functioning at the 20-year follow-up. We found that weight gain was progressive over the entire period, leading to over 50% of bipolar patients and 60% of schizophrenia patients having a body mass index in the obese range 20 years after diagnosis4, a striking change from 8% and 20%, respectively, at the time of first diagnosis. In a separate examination of the everyday functioning of these same patients at the 20-year follow-up, we found that schizophrenia patients, who had a greater prevalence of obesity and worse cognitive performance, also had worse everyday functioning outcomes in terms of sustaining competitive employment and living independently5. For both patient samples, cognitive impairment and two indicators of physical functioning, waist circumference and the ability to rapidly and repeatedly rise from a chair (chair stands), were associated with competitive employment. When a logistic regression was used to predict employment, diagnosis accounted for 11% of the variance, with chair stands accounting for 9% and negative symptoms for an additional 5%. The diagnostic effect was likely associated with cognitive differences between the groups, but mobility limitations associated with obesity were excellent predictors of work outcomes. Modeling residential independence, only diagnosis accounted for variance in outcomes. These findings do not cast any doubt on the importance of cognitive impairments for predictions of everyday outcomes. Rather, they likely suggest th

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20647

Cites

9 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Green MF, Horan WP, Lee J. World Psychiatry 2019;18:146-61.
  2. Le Hellard S, Wang Y, Witoelar A et al. Schizophr Bull 2017;43:654-64.
  3. Savage JE, Jansen PR, Stringer S et al. Nat Genet 2018;50:912-9.
  4. McCarthy NS, Badcock JC, Clark ML et al. Schizophr Bull 2018;44:908-21.
  5. Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Mezuk B et al. JAMA Psychiatry 2016;7:465-71.
  6. Sellgren CM, Gracias J, Watmuff B et al. Nat Neurosci 2019;22:374-85.
  7. Donohoe G, Holland J, Mothersill D et al. Psy- chol Med 2018;48:1608-15.
  8. Mollon J, Reichenberg A. Psychol Med 2018; 48:392-403.
  9. Carrion RE, Walder DJ, Auther AM et al. J Psy- chiatr Res 2018;96:231-8.
  10. Green MF, Horan WP, Lee J. World Psychiatry 2019;18:146-61.
  11. Bora E, Akdede BB, Alptekin K. Psychol Med 2017;47:1030-40.
  12. Harvey PD, Strassnig MT. World Psychiatry 2012;11:73-9.
  13. Strassnig MT, Kotov R, Cornacchio D et al. Bipolar Disord 2017;19:336-43.
  14. Strassnig MT, Cornacchio D, Harvey PD et al. J Psychiatr Res 2017;94:180-5.
  15. Strassnig MT, Caceda R, Newcomer JW et al. Trans Neurosci 2012;3:345-54.
  16. Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Levy RB et al. Pub- lic Health Nutr 2018;21:18-26.
  17. Vancampfort D, Firth J, Schuch FB et al. World Psychiatry 2017;16:308-15.
  18. Semkovska M, Bédard MA, Godbout L et al. Schizophr Res 2004;69:289-300. DOI:10.1002/wps.20647

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, P. D., & Strassnig, M. T.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
165-167
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2944011422
Cited by
37
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, social cognition, functional capacity, social competence, disability, global burden of disease, physical fitness, exercise intervention, obesity, comorbidities, decision-making, quality of life, daily functioning, cognitive remediation, pharmacotherapy, motivation, reward sensitivity, neurobiological correlates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review